This site uses cookies for user authentication, optional permanent login and monitoring the number of page views (Google Analytics).
Do you agree with cookies being used in accordance with our Privacy policy? You can change your decision regarding the use of cookies on the Privacy page.

I want to know more

Horizons of Psychology :: Psihološka obzorja

Scientific and Professional Psychological Journal of the Slovenian Psychologists' Association

Indexed in:
Scopus
PsycINFO
Academic OneFile

Member of DOAJ and CrossRef

sien
CONTENTS FOR AUTHORS ABOUT EDITORIAL BOARD LINKS

Search

My Account

Most viewed articles

 

« Back to Volume 28 (2019)

flag Pojdi na slovensko stran članka / Go to the article page in Slovene


Analysis of the internal structure of the Slovenian version of the Prenatal Attachment Inventory (PAI)

Lucija Pavše, Nataša Tul & Vislava Velikonja

pdf Full text (pdf)  |  Views: 267  |  flagWritten in Slovene.  |  Published: February 17, 2019

pdf https://doi.org/10.20419/2019.28.496  |  Cited By: CrossRef (1)

Abstract: A phrase maternal-fetal attachment (MFA) is used to describe a variety of emotions, behaviours, perceptions and cognitions of pregnant woman toward her unborn child. Several scales have been developed for measuring different aspects of MFA. The purpose of this study was to analyse the internal structure and reliability of the Slovenian version of Prenatal Attachment Inventory (PAI; Müller, 1993). PAI and a sociodemographic questionnaire were administered to a sample of 619 pregnant women in their second trimester of pregnancy, recruited from Clinic of Gynaecology and Obstetrics in Ljubljana. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated that a three-factor solution had better fit to the data than a one-factor solution. However, we decided to keep a more parsimonious one-factor solution as there was high overlap between factors in the three-factor solution. We also considered the theoretical background of the PAI and previous studies of its underlying structure. Results showed good reliability of the PAI. PAI is a psychometrically appropriate instrument for use in research setting.

Keywords: Prenatal Attachment Inventory (PAI), confirmatory factor analysis, reliability


Cite:
Pavše, L, Tul, N., & Velikonja, V. (2019). Analiza notranje strukture slovenskega prevoda Lestvice vezi med nosečnico in plodom (PAI) [Analysis of the internal structure of the Slovenian version of the Prenatal Attachment Inventory (PAI)]. Psihološka obzorja, 28, 11–18. https://doi.org/10.20419/2019.28.496


Reference list


Barone, L., Lionetti, F., & Dellagiulia, A. (2014). Maternal-fetal attachment and its correlates in a sample of Italian women: A study using the Prenatal Attachment Inventory. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 32(3), 230–239. CrossRef

Bielawska‐Batorowicz, E., & Siddiqui, A. (2008). A study of prenatal attachment with Swedish and Polish expectant mothers. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 26, 373–384. CrossRef

Bowlby, J. (1982). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. (2nd ed.). New York, NY, ZDA: Basic Books.

Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York, NY, ZDA: The Guilford Press.

Condon, J. T. (1993). The assessment of antenatal emotional attachment: Development of a questionnaire instrument. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 66, 167–183. CrossRef

Cranley, M. S. (1981). Development of a tool for the measurement of maternal attachment during pregnancy. Nursing Research, 30, 281–284. CrossRef

Della Vedova, A. M., Dabrassi, F., & Imbasciati, A. (2008). Assessing prenatal attachment in a sample of Italian women. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 26(2), 86–98. CrossRef

Gau, M. L., & Lee, T. Y. (2003). Construct validity of the prenatal attachment inventory: A confirmatory factor analysis approach. The Journal of Nursing Research, 11(3), 177–187. CrossRef

Hart, R., & McMahon, C. A. (2006). Mood state and psychological adjustment to pregnancy. Archives of Women's Mental Health, 9, 329–337. CrossRef

Honjo, S., Arai, S., Kaneko, H., Ujiie, T., Muracee, S., Sechijama, H. idr. (2003). Antenatal depression and maternal-foetal attachment. Psychopathology, 36, 304–311. CrossRef

Hsu, T. L., & Chen, C. H. (2001). Stress and maternal-fetal attachment of pregnant women during their third trimester. The Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences, 17(1), 36–45.

Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. CrossRef

Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (2006). LISREL 8.80 for Windows [računalniški program]. Lincolnwood, IL, ZDA: Scientific Software International.

Klaus, M. H., & Kennell, J. H. (1976). Maternal-infant bonding. Saint Louis, ZDA: The C.V. Mosby.

Kleinveld, J. H., Timmermans, D. R. M., Van den Berg, M., Van Eijk, J. T. M., & Ten Kate, L. P. (2007). Does offering and performing prenatal screening influence women's attachment to their unborn child? A longitudinal randomized controlled trial. Prenatal Diagnosis, 27, 757–764. CrossRef

Müller, M. E. (1993). Development of the prenatal attachment inventory. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 15, 199–215. CrossRef

Müller, M. E., & Ferketich, S. (1993). Factor analysis of the Maternal Fetal Attachment Scale. Nursing Research, 42, 144–147.

Pallant, J. F., Haines, H. M., Hildingsson, I., Cross, M., & Rubertsson, C. (2014). Psychometric evaluation and refinement of the Prenatal Attachment Inventory. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 32, 112–125. CrossRef

Pavše, L., Tul Mandić, N., & Globevnik Velikonja, V. (2017). Vez med nosečnico in njenim nerojenim otrokom. Psihološka obzorja, 26, 1–7. CrossRef

Raykov, T. (2004). Behavioral scale reliability and measurement invariance evaluation using latent variable modeling. Behavior Therapy, 35(2), 299–331. CrossRef

Rees, B. L. (1980). Measuring identification with the mothering role. Research in Nursing and Health, 2, 49–56. CrossRef

Salisbury, A. (2003). Maternal-foetal attachment. Journal of the American Medical Association, 289, 1701. CrossRef

Siddiqui, A., Hägglöf, B., & Eisemann, M. (1999). An exploration of prenatal attachment in Swedish expectant women. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 17, 369–380. CrossRef

Sočan, G. (2011). Postopki klasične testne teorije. Ljubljana, Slovenija: Filozofska fakulteta.

Van Bakel, H. J. A., Maas, A. J. B. M., Vreeswijk, C. M. J. M., & Vingerhoets, A. J. J. M. (2013). Pictorial representation of attachment: Measuring the parent-fetus relationship in expectant mothers and fathers. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 13, 138–147. CrossRef

Van den Bergh, B., & Simons, A. (2009). A review of scales to measure the mother–foetus relationship. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 27, 114–126. CrossRef

Walsh, J. (2010). Definitions matter: If maternal-fetal relationships are not attachment, what are they? Archives of Women's Mental Health, 13, 449–451. CrossRef


Cited By via CrossRef (1)

Prenatal attachment: using measurement invariance to test the validity of comparisons across eight culturally diverse countries
       Sarah Foley, Claire Hughes, Aja Louise Murray, Adriana Baban, Asvini D. Fernando ...
       Archives of Women's Mental Health, 2021
       https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-021-01105-8


« Back to Volume 28 (2019)