This site uses cookies for user authentication, optional permanent login and monitoring the number of page views (Google Analytics).
Do you agree with cookies being used in accordance with our Privacy policy? You can change your decision regarding the use of cookies on the Privacy page.

I want to know more

Horizons of Psychology :: Psihološka obzorja

Scientific and Professional Psychological Journal of the Slovenian Psychologists' Association

Indexed in:
Scopus
PsycINFO
Academic OneFile

Member of DOAJ and CrossRef

sien
CONTENTS FOR AUTHORS ABOUT EDITORIAL BOARD LINKS

Search

My Account

Most viewed articles

 

« Back to Volume 14 (2005), Issue 1

flag Pojdi na slovensko stran članka / Go to the article page in Slovene


Experiential thinking as transition between pre-operational and operational thinking in children

Matija Svetina

pdf Full text (pdf)  |  Views: 27  |  flagWritten in Slovene.  |  Published: April 4, 2005

Abstract: Abilities of conservation (of number, length, volume, etc.) tend to appear between 6 and 10 years of age. According to the Piaget's theory, the conservation abilities on different domains are supposed to appear at about the same age because their development is related to the concrete operational thinking. Most of the empirical evidence, however, did not support this assumption, suggesting that conservation on specific domains (e. g. number) tends to appear earlier in regard to other domains (e. g. liquid, volume). In addition, children often showed understanding of conservation when presented with every-day problems, but failed to explain the same problem on its logical level. The problem of the present research was twofold: to determine the developmental priority of either domain of conservation, and to better comprehend the relation between logical, experiential, and perceptual understanding of conservation in children. In the study, 153 children, aged 6 to 8 years, were presented with two Piagetian problems of conservation: number and liquid tasks. The results suggested that understanding of the first task (conservation of number) seems to be necessary for understanding of the other task (conservation of liquid). In addition, experiential thinking seems to play an important role in the development of conservation. The findings can be partly explained in terms of the Vigotsky's zone of proximal development, yet they rise hypotheses that still call for further empirical justification.

Keywords: childhood development, cognitive development, conservation, logical thinking, experiential thinking


« Back to Volume 14 (2005), Issue 1