This site uses cookies for user authentication, optional permanent login and monitoring the number of page views (Google Analytics).
Do you agree with cookies being used in accordance with our Privacy policy? You can change your decision regarding the use of cookies on the Privacy page.

I want to know more

Horizons of Psychology :: Psihološka obzorja

Scientific and Professional Psychological Journal of the Slovenian Psychologists' Association

Indexed in:
Scopus
PsycINFO
Academic OneFile

Member of DOAJ and CrossRef

sien
CONTENTS FOR AUTHORS ABOUT EDITORIAL BOARD LINKS

Search

My Account

Most viewed articles

 

« Back to Volume 22 (2013)

flag Pojdi na slovensko stran članka / Go to the article page in Slovene


Impact of error management culture on knowledge performance in professional service firms

Tabea Scheel & Ulf Hausmann

pdf Full text (pdf)  |  Views: 114  |  flagWritten in English.  |  Published: January 23, 2014

pdf https://doi.org/10.20419/2013.22.372  |  Cited By: CrossRef (3)

Abstract: Knowledge is the most crucial resource of the 21st century. For professional service firms (PSFs), knowledge represents the input as well as the output, and thus the fundamental base for performance. As every organization, PSFs have to deal with errors – and how they do that indicates their error culture. Considering the positive potential of errors (e.g., innovation), error management culture is positively related to organizational performance. This longitudinal quantitative study investigates the impact of error management culture on knowledge performance in four waves. The study was conducted in 131 PSFs, i.e. tax accounting offices. As a standard quality management system (QMS) was assumed to moderate the relationship between error management culture and knowledge performance, offices' ISO 9000 certification was assessed. Error management culture correlated positively with knowledge performance at a significant level and predicted knowledge performance one year later. While the ISO 9000 certification correlated positively with knowledge performance, its assumed moderation of the relationship between error management culture and knowledge performance was not consistent. The process-oriented QMS seems to function as facilitator for the more behavior-oriented error management culture. However, the benefit of ISO 9000 certification for tax accounting remains to be proven. Given the impact of error management culture on knowledge performance, PSFs should focus on actively promoting positive attitudes towards errors.

Keywords: error management culture, organizational effectiveness, professional service firms, quality control, longitudinal studies


Cite:
Scheel, T., & Hausmann, U. (2013). Impact of error management culture on knowledge performance in professional service firms. Psihološka obzorja, 22, 66–79. https://doi.org/10.20419/2013.22.372


Reference list


Alvesson, M. (2001). Knowledge work: Ambiguity, image and identity. Human Relations, 54, 863–886. CrossRef

Boer, N.-I., Berends, H., & van Baalen, P. (2011). Relational models for knowledge sharing behavior. European Management Journal, 29, 85–97. CrossRef

BStBK, DATEV, & DStV (Eds.) (2012). Handbuch »Qualitätssicherung und Qualitätsmanagement in der Steuerberatung« [Manual »Quality assurance and quality management in tax accounting«] (5th Ed). Berlin, Germany: DWS.

Bürger, B. (2005). Aspekte der Führung und der strategischen Entwicklung von Professional Service Firms [Aspects of leadership and strategic development of Professional Service Firms]. Wiesbaden, Germany: Deutscher Universitätsverlag.

Cameron, K. S., Quinn, R. E., DeGraff, J., & Thakor, A. V. (2006). Competing values leadership: Creating value in organizations. Northampton, MA, USA: Elgar. CrossRef

Corbett, C. J., Montes-Sancho, M. J., & Kirsch D. A. (2005). The financial impact of ISO 9000 certification in the United States: An empirical analysis. Management Science, 51, 1046–1059.CrossRef

Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 350–383. CrossRef

Frese, M., & Zapf, D. (Eds.) (1991). Fehler bei der Arbeit mit dem Computer. Ergebnisse von Beobachtungen und Befragungen im Bürobereich [Errors at work with the computer: Results from observations and surveys]. Bern, Switzerland: Huber.

Hartnell, C. A., Ou, A. Y., & Kinicki, A. (2011). Organizational culture and organizational effectiveness: A meta-analytic investigation of the Competing Values Framework's theoretical suppositions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 677–694. CrossRef

Homsma, G. J., Van Dyck, C., De Gilder, D., Koopman, P. L., & Elfring, T. (2009). Learning from error: The influence of error incident characteristics. Journal of Business Research, 62, 115–122. CrossRef

Hung, S.-Y., Durcikova, A., Lai, H.-M., & Lin, W.-M. (2011). The influence of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation on individual knowledge sharing behavior. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 69, 415–427. CrossRef

International Organization for Standardization (2011). The ISO survey of certifications: 2011. Retrieved from http://www.iso.org/iso/home/standards/certification/iso-survey.htm.

International Organization for Standardization (2012). The ISO membership manual: 2012. Retrieved from http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_membership_manual_2012.pdf

Keith, N., & Frese, M. (2005). Self-regulation in error management training: Emotion control and metacognition as mediators of performance effects. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 677–691.CrossRef

Lance, C. E., Butts, M. M., & Michels, L. C. (2006). The sources of four commonly reported cutoff criteria: What did they really say? Organizational Research Methods, 9, 202–220.CrossRef

Leach, D. J., Wall, T. D., & Jackson, P. R. (2003). The effect of empowerment on job knowledge: An empirical test involving operators of complex technology. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 76, 27–52.CrossRef

Levine, D. I., & Toffel, M. W. (2010). Quality management and job quality: How the ISO 9001 standard for quality management systems affects employees and employers. Management Science, 56, 978–996.CrossRef

Lowendahl, B. R., Revang, O., & Fosstenlokken, S. M. (2001). Knowledge and value creation in professional service firms: A framework for analysis. Human Relations, 54, 911–931. CrossRef

Maister, D. (2003). Managing the professional service firm. New York: Free Press.

Mintzberg, H. (1983). Structure in fives: Designing effective organizations. Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Prentice Hall.

Nair, A. (2006). Meta-analysis of the relationship between quality management practices and firm performance – implications for quality management theory development. Journal of Operations Management, 24, 948–975. CrossRef

Ramanujam, R., & Goodman, P. S. (2003). Latent errors and adverse organizational consequences: a conceptualization. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 815–836. CrossRef

Rasmussen, J. (1987). The definition of human error and a taxonomy for technical system design. In J. Rasmussen, K. Duncan, & J. Leplat (Eds.), New technology and human error (pp. 23–30). Chichester, England: Wiley.

Reason, J. (1990). Human Error. Cambridge: University press. CrossRef

Rousseau, D. M., & Barends, E. G. R. (2011). Becoming an evidence-based HR practitioner. Human Resource Management Journal, 21, 221–235. CrossRef

Rybowiak, V., Garst, H., Frese, M., & Batinic, B. (1999). Error orientation questionnaire (EOQ): Reliability, validity, and different language equivalence. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 527–547. CrossRef

Sampaio, P., Saraiva, P., & Rodrigues, A. (2010). A classification model for prediction of certification motivations from the contents of ISO 9001 audit reports. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 21, 1279–1298. CrossRef

Schein, E. H. (1996). Culture: The missing concept in organization studies. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 229–240. CrossRef

Scholl, W. (1999). Restrictive control and information pathologies in organizations. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 101–118. CrossRef

Scholl, W., Schermuly, C., & Klocke, U. (2013). Wissensgewinnung durch Führung – die Vermeidung von Informationspathologien durch Kompetenzen für Mitarbeiter (Empowerment) [Knowledge gain by leadership – the avoidance of information pathologies by competencies for employees (empowerment)]. In S. Grote (Ed.), Die Zukunft der Führung [The Future of leadership] (pp. 391–413). Berlin, Germany: Springer.

Seibert, S. E., Wang, G., & Courtright, S. H. (2011). Antecedents and consequences of psychological and team empowerment in organizations: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 981–1003. CrossRef

Spector, P. (2006). Method variance in organizational research: Truth or urban legend? Organizational Research Methods, 9, 221–232.CrossRef

Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. The Academy of Management Journal, 38, 1442–1265.CrossRef

Treem, J. W. (2012). Communicating expertise: Knowledge performances in professional-service firms. Communication Monographs, 79, 23–47. CrossRef

Tzelepis, D., Tsekouras, K., Skuras, D., & Dimara, E. (2006). The effects of ISO 9001 on firms' productive efficiency. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 26, 1146–1165. CrossRef

van Dyck, C., Frese, M., Baer, M., & Sonnentag, S. (2005). Organizational error management culture and its impact on performance: A two-study replication. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 1228–1240. CrossRef

von Nordenflycht, A. (2010). What is a professional service firm? Toward a theory and taxonomy of knowledge-intensive firms. Academy of Management Review, 35, 155–174. CrossRef

Weston, R., & Gore, P. A., Jr. (2006). A brief guide to structural equation modeling. The Counseling Psychologist, 34, 719–751. CrossRef

Wiewiora, A., Trigunarsyah, B., Murphy, G., & Coffey, V. (2013). Organizational culture and willingness to share knowledge: A competing values perspective in Australian context. International Journal of Project Management, 31, 1163–1174. CrossRef

Wilkinson, A. (1998). Empowerment: Theory and practice. Personnel Review, 27, 40–56. CrossRef

Zapf, D., Brodbeck, F. C., Frese, M., Peters, H., & Prümper, J. (1992). Errors in working with office computers: A first validation of a taxonomy for observed errors in a field setting. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 4, 311–339. CrossRef

Zheng, W., Yang, B., & McLean, G. N. (2010). Linking organizational culture, structure, strategy, and organizational effectiveness: Mediating role of knowledge management. Journal of Business Research, 63, 763–771. CrossRef


Cited By via CrossRef (3)

Action Errors, Error Management, and Learning in Organizations
       Michael Frese, Nina Keith
       Annual Review of Psychology, 2015
       https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015205

Knowledge sharing to learn from error: a case study in a professional service triad
       Rajaram Natarajan, J. Ajith Kumar
       VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 2023
       https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-07-2022-0223

Digitalisierung der Arbeit und Eigeninitiative – die Rolle der organisationalen Fehlerkultur
       Anne Traum, Philipp K. Görs, Friedemann W. Nerdinger
       Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie A&O, 2024
       https://doi.org/10.1026/0932-4089/a000429


« Back to Volume 22 (2013)