This site uses cookies for user authentication, optional permanent login and monitoring the number of page views (Google Analytics).
Do you agree with cookies being used in accordance with our Privacy policy? You can change your decision regarding the use of cookies on the Privacy page.

I want to know more

Horizons of Psychology :: Psihološka obzorja

Scientific and Professional Psychological Journal of the Slovenian Psychologists' Association

Indexed in:
Academic OneFile

Member of DOAJ and CrossRef



My Account

Most viewed articles


« Back to Volume 31 (2022)

flag Pojdi na slovensko stran članka / Go to the article page in Slovene

Can educational psychology develop to meet the challenges, choices and changes of a 21st century world?

Marie Huxtable

pdf Full text (pdf)  |  Views: 126  |  flagWritten in English.  |  Published: September 16, 2022

pdf  |  Cited By: CrossRef (0)

Abstract: Since the 1970s there have been many changes in England to qualifications required to practice as an educational psychologist and the nature of the organisations for which they work. These reflect the slow transformation in societal attitudes to the purposes of public services, education and the role and responsibilities of associated professionals. As a consequence, educational psychology as a distinct field of knowledge and practice is gradually being replaced by the general practice of psychology in Education. I believe that recognising, valuing and working to improve educational psychology as a distinct field of knowledge and practice can make a valuable contribution to the educational development of children and young people as they begin their life-long learning to live satisfying, productive and worthwhile lives for themselves and others as global citizens. Since leaving the profession of educational psychology I have continued to develop theory and practice as a professional educational practitioner supporting the professional development of other educational practitioners working in diverse fields of practice and cultural contexts. I see them faced with the same challenges as educational psychologists to realise their responsibilities as professional educational practitioners working within the constraints imposed by their employers and national government. Education is a values-laden concept and the challenge to us all is not to lose sight of that. I see how members of other professions are creating possibilities of holding fast to values that distinguish educational practice, which I believe educational psychologists might find of use. In this paper I offer an argument for distinguishing between ‘educational psychology as a distinct field of knowledge and practice’ and ‘the practice of psychology in Education’, why it is important and possible ways forward.

Keywords: professional educational practice, practitioner educational research, living educational theory research, educational psychology practice, flourishing of humanity

Huxtable, M. (2022). Can educational psychology develop to meet the challenges, choices and changes of a 21st century world? Psihološka obzorja, 31, 453–461.

Reference list

Amrein, A., & Berliner, D. (2002). The impact of high-stakes tests on student academic performance: An analysis of NAEP results in states with high-stakes tests and ACT, SAT, and AP test results in states with high school graduation exams. Education Policy Research Unit, Arizona State University.

Biesta, G. J. J. (2006). Beyond learning: Democratic education for a human future. Paradigm.

Bloom, B. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: Book 1. Cognitive domain. Longman.

Borland, J. H. (2003). Rethinking gifted education. Teachers College Press.

British Educational Research Association. (2018). Ethical guidelines for educational research (4th ed.).

British Psychological Society. (2010). Code of human research ethics.

British Psychological Society. (2018). Code of human research ethics.

British Psychological Society. (2021). What is psychology?

Crompton, T. (2010). Common cause: The case for working with our cultural values.

Dadds, M., Hart, S., & Crotty, T. (2001). Doing practitioner research differently. Routledge/Falmer. CrossRef

Einstein, A. (1932). My Credo. Albert Einstein Archives, Hebrew University of Jerusalem.

Eisner, E. W. (1993). Forms of understanding and the future of educational research. Educational Researcher, 22(7), 5–11. CrossRef

Foucault, M. (1995). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (A. Sheridan, Trans.). Vintage. (Original work published 1975)

Gallagher, S. (1999). An exchange of gazes. In J. L. Kinchloe, S. R. Steinberg & L. E. Villeverde (Eds.), Rethinking intelligence (pp. 69–84). Routledge.

Ginott, H. (1972). Teacher and child. Macmillan.

Habermas, J. (1976). Communication and the evolution of society. Heinemann.

Haring, N., Lovitt, T., Eaton M., & Hansen, C. (1978). The fourth R: Research in the classroom. Merrill.

Health and Care Professions Council. (2016). Standards of conduct, performance and ethics.

Huxtable, M. (2006, September 6–9). Making public my embodied knowledge as an educational psychologist in the enquiry, How can (do) I improve my practice as a senior educational psychologist? [Paper presentation]. BERA Annual Conference, University of Warwick, UK.

Huxtable, M. (2012). How do I evolve living-educational-theory praxis in living-boundaries? [Doctoral dissertation, University of Bath, UK].

Hymer, B. (2007). How do I understand and communicate my values and beliefs in my work as an educator in the field of giftedness? [Doctoral dissertation, University of Newcastle, UK.]

Mansell, W. (2007). Education by numbers: The tyranny of testing. Politico.

Oxford University Press. (n.d.). Enquire. In Oxford Learner's Dictionaries. Retrieved March 11, 2022, from

Pring, R. (2000). Philosophy of educational research. Continuum. CrossRef

Reiss, M., & White, J. (2013). An aims-based curriculum: The significance of human flourishing for schools. IOE Press.

Robinson, S. K. (2006, February). Do schools kill creativity? [Video]. TED Conferences.

Sachs, J. (2001). Teacher professional identity: Competing discourses, competing outcomes. Journal of Education Policy, 16(2), 149–161. CrossRef

Schön, D. A. (1995). Knowing-in-action: The new scholarship requires a new epistemology. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 27(6), 27–34. CrossRef

West Burnham, J. (2006). Understanding learning: Creating a shared vocabulary. In B. Wallace & G. Erickson (Eds.), Diversity in gifted education: International perspective on global issues (pp. 45–55). Routledge.

Whitehead, J. (1989a). Creating a living educational theory from questions of the kind, "How do I improve my practice?" Cambridge Journal of Education, 19(1), 41–52. CrossRef

Whitehead, J. (1989b). How do we improve research-based professionalism in education? A question which includes action research, educational theory and the politics of educational knowledge. British Educational Research Journal, 15(1), 3–17. CrossRef

Whitehead, J. (2011, November 16-17). Theories produced by practitioner researchers: Contribution to improvement both locally and globally [Keynote presentation]. Research on Teacher Education, Solstrand, Norway.

Whitehead, J. (2018). Living theory research as a way of life. Brown Dog Books.

« Back to Volume 31 (2022)