« Nazaj na Letnik 21 (2012), Številka 1
Go to the article page in English / Pojdi na angleško stran članka
Merske značilnosti slovenske oblike Vprašalnika usmerjenosti k sreči (OTH)
Andreja Avsec in Tina Kavčič
Polno besedilo (pdf) | Ogledi: 117 | 
Napisan v slovenščini. | Objavljeno: 28. oktober 2012
https://doi.org/10.20419/2012.21.354 | Citati: CrossRef (2)
Povzetek: V članku sva preverjali merske značilnosti Vprašalnika usmerjenosti k sreči OTH (Peterson, Park in Seligman, 2005), ki meri tri različne načine doseganja sreče, to je preko užitka (hedonizem), smisla (eudaimonia) in vpletenosti (zanos). Vprašalnik je bil v več korakih preveden v slovenščino (dva neodvisna strokovna prevoda, usklajevanje, prevod nazaj v angleščino, usklajevanje). 1064 udeležencev, starih od 18 do 91 let, je poleg usmerjenosti k sreči poročalo še o zadovoljstvu s svojim življenjem. Konfirmatorna faktorska analiza je pokazala mejno sprejemljivo prileganje naših podatkov predpostavljenemu trifaktorskemu modelu. Rezultati so pokazali tudi zadovoljivo notranjo skladnost vseh treh lestvic (alfa koeficienti od 0,70 do 0,83) ter ustrezno visoko povezanost med posameznimi postavkami in skupnimi rezutlati na pripadajočih lestvicah. Dobljeni koeficienti interkorelacije so pokazali nizko povezanost med usmerjenostjo k užitku in usmerjenostjo k smislu ter zmerno povezanost usmerjenosti k vpletenosti z obema ostalima usmerjenostima. Moški in ženske se med seboj niso statistično pomembno razlikovali v samoocenah usmerjenosti k sreči, starost udeležencev pa je bila statistično pomembno, vendar nizko povezana z nižjo usmerjenostjo k užitku. Ob upoštevanju demografskih značilnostih udeležencev sta usmerjenosti k užitku in k vpletenosti pomembno izboljšali napoved zadovoljstva z življenjem. Rezultati tudi kažejo, da so s svojim življenjem najbolj zadovoljni tisti posamezniki, ki so se razmeroma visoko ocenili na vseh treh lestvicah usmerjenosti k sreči.
Ključne besede: Vprašalnik usmerjenosti k sreči, zadovoljstvo z življenjem, užitek, vpletenost, smisel
Citiraj:
Avsec, A. in Kavčič. T. (2012). Merske značilnosti slovenske oblike Vprašalnika usmerjenosti k sreči (OTH) [Psychometric properties of the Slovene version of the Orientations to Happiness Questionnaire]. Psihološka obzorja, 21(1), 7–18. https://doi.org/10.20419/2012.21.354
Seznam literature v članku
Andrews, F. M. in S. B. Withey, (1976). Social indicators of well-being. New York: Plenum Press. CrossRef
Andrews, F. M. in Robinson, J. P. (1991). Measures of subjective well-being. V J. P. Robinson in P. R. Shaver (ur.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (str. 61–114). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Anić, P. (2012). How to find happiness: Life goals and free time activities (Doctoral dissertation). Univerza v Ljubljani, Ljubljana, Slovenija.
Asendorpf, J. B. (2003). Head-to-head comparison of the predictive validity of personality types and dimensions. European Journal of Personality, 17, 327–346. CrossRef
Chen, G.-H. (2010). Validating the Orientations to Happiness Scale in a Chinese sample of university students. Social Indicators Research, 99, 431–442. CrossRef
Chen, L. H., Tsai, Y.-M. in Chen, M.-Y. (2009). Psychometric analysis of the orientations to happiness questionnaire in Taiwanese undergraduate students. Social Indicator Research, 98, 239–249. CrossRef
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow, The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper and Row.
Cummins, R. A., Eckersley, R., Pallant, J., Van Vugt, J. in Misajon, R. (2003). Developing a national index of subjective well-being: The Australian Unity Well-being Index. Social Indicators Research, 64, 159–190. CrossRef
Davern, M., Cummins, R. A. in Stokes, M. (2007). Subjective well-being as an affective/cognitive construct. Journal of Happiness Studies, 8, 429–449. CrossRef
Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J. in Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction with Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75. CrossRef
Diener, E. in Ryan, K. (2009). Subjective well-being: A general overview. South African Journal of Psychology, 39, 391–406. CrossRef
Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3. izd.) . London: Sage Publications.
Garson, G. D. (2012). Structural equation modeling, s strani Statnotes: Topics in multivariate analysis. Pridobljeno 30.03.2012 s http://faculty.chass.ncsu.edu/garson/pa765/statnote.htm
Glaesmer, H., Grande, G., Braehler, E. in Roth, M. (2011). The German version of the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS): Psychometric properties, validity, and population-based norms. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 27, 127–132. CrossRef
Kahneman, D. (1999). Objective happiness. V D. Kahneman, E. Diener in N. Schwarz (ur.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (str. 3–25). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Kumano, M. (2011). Orientations to happiness in Japanese people: Pleasure, meaning, and engagement. Shinrigaku Kenkyu, 81, 619–624. CrossRef
Lyubomirsky, S. in Lepper, H. S. (1999). A measure of subjective happiness: Preliminary reliability and construct validation. Social Indicators Research, 46, 137–155. CrossRef
Mayer, J. D. (2007). Personality: A systems approach. Boston: Pearson Education.
Mellor, D., Stokes, M., Firth, L., Hayashi, Y. in Cummins, R. (2008). Need for belonging, relationship satisfaction, loneliness, and life satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 213–218. CrossRef
Musek, J. (2000). Nova psihološka teorija vrednot. Ljubljana: Educy.
Park, N., Peterson, C. in Ruch, W. (2009). Orientations to happiness and life satisfaction in twenty-seven nations. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 4, 273–279. CrossRef
Pavot, W. in Diener, E. (1993). Review of the Satisfaction with Life Scale. Psychological Assessment, 5, 164–172. CrossRef
Peterson, C., Park, N. in Seligman, M. E. P. (2005). Orientations to happiness and life satisfaction: The full life versus the empty life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 6, 25–41. CrossRef
Peterson, C., Ruch, W., Beermann, U., Park, N. in Seligman, M. E. P. (2007). Strengths of character, orientation to happiness, and life satisfaction. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 2, 149–156. CrossRef
Ruch, W., Harzer, C., Proyer, T. R., Park, N. in Peterson, C. (2010). Ways to happiness in German-speaking countries: The adaptation of the German version of the orientations to happiness questionnaire in paper-pencil and internet samples. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 26, 227–234. CrossRef
Ryan, R. M. in Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141–166. CrossRef
Ryff, C. D. in Singer, B. (2008). Know thyself and become what you are: A eudaimonic approach to psychological well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9, 13–39. CrossRef
San Martín, J., Perles, F. in Canto, J. M. (2010). Life satisfaction and perception of happiness among university students. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 13, 617–628. CrossRef
Schueller, S. M. in Seligman, M. E. P. (2010). Pursuit of pleasure, engagement, and meaning: Relationships to subjective and objective measures of well-being. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 5, 253–263. CrossRef
Seligman, M. E. P. (2002.). Authentic happiness. New York: The Free Press.
Seligman, M. E. P., Parks, A. C. in Steen, T. (2005). A balanced psychology and a full life. V F. Huppert, B. Keverne in N. Baylis (ur.), The science of well-being (str. 275–283). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Smyth, J. D. in Pearson, J. E. (2008). Internet survey methods: A review of strengths, weaknesses, and innovations. V M. Das, P. Ester in L. Kaczmirek (ur.), Social and behavioral research and the internet advances in applied methods and research strategies (str. 14–36). New York, London: Rutledge.
SURS (2011). Uporaba informacijsko - komunikacijske tehnologije v gospodinjstvih in pri posameznikih, Slovenija, 2011 – končni podatki. Pridobljeno 30.03.2012 s http://www.stat.si/novica_prikazi.aspx?ID=4240.
Veenhoven, R. (2012). World Database of Happiness, s strani Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Pridobljeno 4.4.2012 s http://worlddatabaseofhappiness.eur.nl.
Vella-Brodrick, D. A., Park, N. in Peterson, C. (2008). Three ways to be happy: Pleasure, engagement, and meaning—Findings from Australian and US samples. Social Indicators Research, 90, 165–179. CrossRef
Vittersø, J. (2003). Flow versus life satisfaction: A projective use of cartoons to illustrate the difference between the evaluation approach and the intrinsic motivation approach to subjective quality of life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 4, 141–167. CrossRef
Vittersø, J. in Søholt, Y. (2011). Life satisfaction goes with pleasure and personal growth goes with interest: Further arguments for separating hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Journal of Positive Psychology, 6, 326–335. CrossRef
Waterman, A.S. (1993). Two conceptions of happiness: Contrasts of personal expressiveness (eudaimonia) and hedonic enjoyment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 678–691. CrossRef
Zupančič, M., Podlesek, A. in Kavčič, T. (2006). Personality types as derived from parental reports on 3-year-old. European Journal of Personality, 20, 285–303. CrossRef
Citati prek sistema CrossRef (2)
Merjenje napovednikov blagostanja med mladostniki v Sloveniji: psihometrične značilnosti mere MDI in dimenzij mere EPOCH
Ana Kozina, Valentina Čufar
Psihološka obzorja / Horizons of Psychology, 2019
https://doi.org/10.20419/2019.28.504
When are people willing to help others? Links with eudaimonic versus hedonic motives
Keith Pearce, Veronika Huta
Motivation and Emotion, 2023
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-022-10004-z
