Spletna stran Psiholoških obzorij uporablja piškotke za namene avtentikacije uporabnikov po prijavi na spletno stran, morebitno stalno prijavo na željo uporabnika in za namen beleženja števila ogledov posameznih strani Psiholoških obzorij.
Ali se strinjate, da na vaš računalnik (brskalnik) naložimo piškotke za te namene? Svojo odločitev lahko kasneje tudi spremenite na strani Zasebnost.

Želim izvedeti več

Psihološka obzorja :: Horizons of Psychology

Znanstveno-strokovna psihološka revija Društva psihologov Slovenije

Indeksirana v:
Scopus
PsycINFO
Academic OneFile

Smo člani DOAJ in CrossRef

sien
VSEBINA ZA AVTORJE PREDSTAVITEV UREDNIŠTVO POVEZAVE

Iskalnik

Moj račun

Članki z največ ogledi

 

« Nazaj na Letnik 21 (2012), Številka 1

flag Go to the article page in English / Pojdi na angleško stran članka


Raziskovanje kognitivnih shem kot individualnih ali skupinskih struktur

Ana Arzenšek

pdf Polno besedilo (pdf)  |  Ogledi: 68  |  flagNapisan v slovenščini.  |  Objavljeno: 28. oktober 2012

pdf https://doi.org/10.20419/2012.21.357  |  Citati: CrossRef (0)

Povzetek: V prispevku je predstavljenih nekaj značilnosti teorije kognitivnih shem. Ukvarjali smo se z vprašanjem, na kateri ravni naj se raziskujejo kognitivne sheme: na individualni-, nadindividualni-, ali celo na ravni večjih socialnih sistemov, in sicer glede na značilnosti socialne kognicije ter glede na naravo kognitivnih shem. V zadnjem obdobju se raziskovalci kognitivnih shem osredotočajo na interakcijo med motivacijskimi, kognitivnimi in drugimi osebnimi ter situacijskimi spremenljivkami in njihovim vplivom na vedenje. Kognitivne sheme so razumljene kot rezultat medsebojnega prepleta osebnih, okoljskih in situacijskih spremenljivk. Odgovor na zastavljeno vprašanje pa je odvisen tudi od paradigme, znotraj katere raziskovalec raziskuje in od raziskovalnega problema.

Ključne besede: sheme, socialna kognicija, teorije, raziskovanje


Citiraj:
Arzenšek, A. (2012). Raziskovanje kognitivnih shem kot individualnih ali skupinskih struktur [Exploring the cognitive schemas as individual or group structures]. Psihološka obzorja, 21(1), 39–49. https://doi.org/10.20419/2012.21.357


Seznam literature v članku


Argyris, C. in Schön, D. A. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley.

Arzenšek, A. (2010). Interpretativne sheme upravljanja s človeškimi viri med gospodarsko krizo: Primer proizvajalcev za avtomobilsko panogo [Interpretive schemas of human resource management in economic crisis: The case of producers in automotive sector]. Psihološka obzorja [Horizons of Psychology], 19(1), 45–62.

Asch, S. E. (1946). Forming impressions of personality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 41, 1230–1240. CrossRef

Augoustinos, M. in Walker, I. (1995). Social cognition: An integrated introduction (1. izd.). London: Sage.

Augoustinos, M., Walker, I. in Donagheve, N. (2006). Social cognition: An integrated introduction (2. izd.). London: Sage.

Axelrod, R. (1973). Schema theory: An information processing model of perception and cognition. The American Political Science Review, 67(4), 1248–1266. CrossRef

Balogun, J. in Johnson, G. (2004). Organizational restructuring and middle manager sensemaking. Academy of Management Journal, 47(4), 523–549. CrossRef

Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bartunek, J. M. (1984). Changing interpretive schemes and organizational restructuring: The example of a religious order. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(3), 355–372. CrossRef

Bartunek, J. M. in Moch, M. K. (1987). First-order, second-order, and third-order change and organizational development interventions: A cognitive approach. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 23, 483–500. CrossRef

Bartunek, J. M., Lacey, C. A. in Wood, D. R. (1992). Social cognition in organizational change: An insider–outsider approach. Journal of Applicative Behavioral Science, 28, 204–223. CrossRef

Bečaj, J. (2000). Kognitivna paradigma v socialni psihologiji [Cognitive paradigm in social psychology]. Panika, 4(4), 13–16.

Bem, L. S. (1981). Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing source. Psychological Review, 88, 354–364. CrossRef

Derry, S. J. (1996). Cognitive schema theory in the constructivist debate. Educational Psychologist, 31 (3/4), 163–174. CrossRef

Fiske, S. T. in Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition (2. izd.). New York: McGraw Hill.

Fiske, S. T. (1993). Social cognition and social perception. Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 155–194. CrossRef

Fiske, S. T. (2000). Schema. V A. E. Kazdin (ur.), Encyclopedia of psychology, 7 (str. 158–160). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Gioia, D. A. in Poole, P. P. (1984). Scripts in organizational behavior. Academy of Management Review, 9, 449–459.

Gioia, D. A. in Chittipeddi, K. (1991). Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation. Strategic Management Journal, 12(6), 433–448. CrossRef

Grossenbacher, S. (2008). Inside the mind of decision makers: Antecedents and consequences of managers' mental models. Hamburg: Verlag Dr. Kovac.

Harris, S. G. (1994). Organizational culture and individual sensemaking: A schema-based perspective. Organization Science, 5(3), 309–321. CrossRef

Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley. CrossRef

Holland, D. in Cole, M. (1995). Between discourse and schema: Reformulating a cultural-historical approach to culture and mind. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 26(4), 475–489. CrossRef

House, J. S. (1977). The three faces of social psychology. Sociometry, 40(2), 161–177. CrossRef

Kuhn T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University Press.

Kuklinski, J. H., Luskin, R. C. in Bolland, J. (1991). Where is the schema? Going beyond the "S" word in political psychology. The American Political Science Review, 85(4), 1341–1356. CrossRef

Labianca G., Gray, B. in Brass, D. J. (2000). A grounded model of organizational schema change during empowerment. Organization Science, 11(2), 235–257. CrossRef

Lau, C. M. in Woodman, R. W. (1995). Understanding organizational change: A schematic perspective. The Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 537–554. CrossRef

Lodge, M., McGraw, K. M., Johnston Conover, P., Feldman, S. in Miller, A. H. (1991). Where is the Schema? Critiques. The American Political Science Review, 85(4), 1357–1380. CrossRef

Markus, H. (1977). Self-schemata and processing information about the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 63–78. CrossRef

Markus, H. in Zajonc, R. B. (1985). The cognitive perspective in social psychology. V L. Gardner in E. Aronson (ur.), The Handbook of Social Psychology (3. izd.) (str. 137–230). New York: Random House.

McKinley, W., Zhao, J. in Garrett Rust, K. (2000). A sociocognitive interpretation of organizational downsizing. The Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 227–243.

McVee, M. B., Dunsmore, K. in Gavelek, J. R. (2005). Schema theory revisited. Review of Educational Research, 75(4), 531–566. CrossRef

Moch, M. K. in Bartunek, J. M. (1990). Creating alternative realities at work: The quality of work life experiment at FoodCom. New York: Harper Business.

Moscovici, S. (1984). The phenomenon of social representations. V R. M. Farr in S. Moscovici (ur.), Social representations (str. 3–69). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nickles, T. (2000). Kuhnian puzzle solving and schema theory. Philosophy of Science: Proceedings of the 1998 Biennial Meetings of the Philosophy of Science Association 67, S242–S255. CrossRef

Operario, D. in Fiske, S. T. (1999). Social cognition permeats social psychology: Motivated mental processes guide the study of human social behavior. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2, 63–78. CrossRef

Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. New York: International University Press. CrossRef

Reger, R. K. in Palmer, T. B. (1996). Managerial categorization of competitors: Using old maps to navigate new environments. Organization Science, 7(1), 22–39. CrossRef

Reeder, G. D. in Brewer, M. B. (1979). A schematic model of dispositional attribution in interpersonal perception. Psychological Review, 86, 61 – 79. CrossRef

Rumelhart, D. E. (1984). Schemata and the cognitive system. V R. S. Wyer in T. K. Srull (ur.), The handbook of social cognition (Vol. 1, str. 161–188). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Rus, V. S. (1989). Socialna kognicija: zgodovinsko ozadje [Social cognition: historical background]. Anthropos, 20 (3–4), 170–180.

Rus, V. S. (1991). Socialno-kognitivna psihologija in nove teorije stališč [Social cognitive psychology and new theories of attitudes]. Anthropos, 23(4–5), 278–291.

Shetzer, L. (1993). A social information processing model of employee participation. Organization Science, 4(2), 252–268. CrossRef

Taylor, S. E. in Crocker, J. (1981). Schematic bases of social information processing. V T. E. Higgins, C. A. Harman in M. P. Zanna (ur.), Social cognition: The Ontario symposium on personality and social psychology (str. 89–134). New Jersey: Erlbaum.

Vaugham, G. M. in Hogg, M. A. (2008). Social psychology (5. izd). Essex: Pearson Education Limited.

Watzlawick, P., Weakland, J. H. in Fisch, R. (1974). Change principles of problem formation and problem resolution. New York: Horton.

White, D. J. in Carlston, D. E. (2005). Consequence of schemata for attention, impressions and recall in complex social interactions. V D. Hamilton (ur.), Social cognition: Key readings (str. 36–47). New York: Psychology Press.

Weber, R. in Crocker, J. (1983). Cognitive processes in the revision of stereotypic beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 961–977. CrossRef

Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, 35, 151–175. CrossRef


« Nazaj na Letnik 21 (2012), Številka 1