Go to the article page in English / Pojdi na angleško stran članka
Konstruktna veljavnost Testa implicitnih asociacij za merjenje velikih pet
Gaja Zager Kocjan, Andreja Avsec in Valentin Bucik
Polno besedilo (pdf) | Ogledi: 419 | 
Napisan v slovenščini. | Objavljeno: 1. februar 2014
https://doi.org/10.20419/2013.22.380 | Citati: CrossRef (0)
Povzetek: V zadnjem času je v psihologiji opazen porast zanimanja za t. i. implicitne mere stališč in osebnostnih lastnosti. Najbolj razširjena implicitna mera je Test implicitnih asociacij – IAT, ki smo ga v naši raziskavi priredili za merjenje velikih petih osebnostnih dimenzij (B5 IAT) in preverili njegove merske značilnosti z dvema vzorcema – na osnovi ugotovitev s prvega vzorca (N = 62) smo test popravili ter ga ponovno preizkusili na drugem vzorcu (N = 75). Pri obeh vzorcih so bili rezultati podobni. Zanesljivosti dimenzij osebnosti, merjenih z B5 IAT, v večini primerov niso dosegle zadovoljive ravni. Razlog je verjetno v manjši ustreznosti nekaterih dražljajev ter precejšnji dolžini testnega postopka. Konvergentna veljavnost B5 IAT z eksplicitnimi merami osebnosti je bila nizka, kar lahko razložimo z različnimi izhodišči in strukturami, na katerih temeljijo implicitne in eksplicitne mere. Rezultati konfirmatorne faktorske analize so na prvem vzorcu pokazali, da lahko korelacije med postavkami IAT razmeroma zadovoljivo pojasnimo s petimi latentnimi dimenzijami, vendar moramo biti pri njihovi interpretaciji posebej previdni zaradi nižjih zanesljivosti nekaterih lestvic B5 IAT in majhnosti vzorca. Drugi vzorec se je v meritvi izkazal za precej nestabilnega, zato konfirmatorne faktorske analize nismo mogli izvesti. Ker gre za prvi poskus priredbe B5 IAT v slovenskem jezikovnem prostoru, ne preseneča, da rezultati niso povsem skladni s pričakovanji. Implicitne mere zaenkrat ne dosegajo ustreznih psihometričnih značilnosti, zato v psihološki praksi še niso uporabne. Kljub temu imajo precejšen potencial pri raziskovanju osebnosti in individualnih razlik, saj premagujejo številne omejitve obstoječih pripomočkov (eksplicitnih mer).
Ključne besede: petfaktorski model osebnosti, implicitne mere, Test implicitnih asociacij – IAT, sestava testa
Citiraj:
Zager Kocjan, G., Avsec, A. in Bucik, V. (2013). Konstruktna veljavnost Testa implicitnih asociacij za merjenje velikih pet [Construct validity of the Big Five Implicit Association Test]. Psihološka obzorja, 22, 91–104. https://doi.org/10.20419/2013.22.380
Seznam literature v članku
Asendorpf, J. B., Banse, R. in Mücke, D. (2002). Double dissociation between implicit and explicit self-concept: The case of shy behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 380–393. CrossRef
Avsec, A. in Sočan, G. (2007). Vprašalnik petih velikih faktorjev BFI [Big Five inventory BFI]. V A. Avsec (ur.), Psihodiagnostika osebnosti [The psychodiagnostics of personality] (str. 171–178). Ljubljana: Filozofska fakulteta, Oddelek za psihologijo.
Back, M. D., Schmukle, S. C. in Egloff, B. (2009). Predicting actual behavior from the explicit and implicit self-concept of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(3), 533–548. CrossRef
Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equation models with latent variables. New York: Wiley.
Bucik, V. (2007). Vprašalnik petih velikih faktorjev BFQ [Big five questionnaire BFQ]. V A. Avsec (ur.), Psihodiagnostika osebnosti [The psychodiagnostics of personality] (str. 153–170). Ljubljana: Filozofska fakulteta, Oddelek za psihologijo.
Burt, C. (1948). The factorial structure of temperamental traits. British Journal of Psychology, 1, 178–203.
Campbell, D. T. in Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 276–279. CrossRef
Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C. in Borgogni, L. (1993). BFQ – Big Five Questionnaire: Manuale. Firenze: Organizzazioni Speziali.
Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Borgogni, L., Bucik, V. in Boben, D. (1997). Model "velikih pet": Pripomočki za merjenje strukture osebnosti: Priročnik [The "Big Five" model: Accessories for measurement of personality structure: Manual]. Ljubljana: Produktivnost, Center za psihodiagnostična sredstva.
Draine, S. (2010). Inquisit 3.0.4.0[računalniško programsko orodje]. Seattle: Millisecond Software.
Fazio, R. H., Jackson, J. R., Dunton, B. C. in Williams, C. J. (1995). Variability in automatic activation as an unobtrusive measure of racial attitudes: A bona fide pipeline? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 1013–1027. CrossRef
Goldberg, L.R. (1990). An alternative "Description of personality": The Big-Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216–1229. CrossRef
Greenwald, A. G. in Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102, 4–27. CrossRef
Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E. in Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(4), 1464–1480. CrossRef
Greenwald, A. G., Nosek, B. A. in Banaji, M. R. (2003). Understanding and using the Implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 197–216. CrossRef
Grumm, M. in von Collani, G. (2007). Measuring Big-Five personality dimensions with the Implicit association test – Implicit personality traits or self-esteem? Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 2205–2217. CrossRef
John, O. P., Donahue, E. M. in Kentle, R. L. (1991). The "Big Five" Inventory-Versions 4a and 54. Berkeley: University of California, Institute of Personality and Social Research.
John, O. P. in Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five Trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. V L. A. Pervin in O. P. John (ur.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research(str. 102–139). New York: Guilford.
Jöreskog, K. G. in Sörbom, D. (2004). LISREL 8.7 for Windows[računalniško programsko orodje]. Lincolnwood: Scientific Software International.
Lane, K. A., Banaji, M. R., Nosek, B. A. in Greenwald, A. G. (2007). Understanding and using the Implicit association test: IV: Procedures and validity. V B. Wittenbrink in N. Schwarz (ur.), Implicit measures of attitudes: Procedures and controversies(str. 59–102). New York: Guilford.
Maison, D., Greenwald, A. G. in Bruin, R. H. (2004). Predictive validity of the Implicit association test in studies of brands, consumer attitudes and behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14, 405–416. CrossRef
McCrae, R. R. in Costa, P. T. (1987). Validation of the five-factor model across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 81–90. CrossRef
Mierke, J. in Klauer, K. C. (2003). Method-specific variance in the Implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 1180–1192. CrossRef
Nosek, B. A., Greenwald, A. G. in Banaji, M. R. (2005). Understanding and using the Implicit association test: II. Method variables and construct validity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 166–180. CrossRef
Nosek, B. A., Hawkins, C. B. in Frazier, R. S. (2011). Implicit social cognition: From measures to mechanisms. Trends in Cognitive Science, 15(4), 152–159. CrossRef
Ostendorf, F. (1994). Zur Taxonomie deutscher Dispositionsbegriffe [To the taxonomy of German disposition terms]. V W. Hager in M. Hasselhorn (ur.), Handbuch deutschsprachiger Wortnormen [Handbook of German word norms] (str. 382–441). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Perugini, M. in Banse, R. (2007). Editorial: Personality, implicit self-concept and automaticity. European Journal of Personality, 21, 257–261. CrossRef
Petty, R. E., Fazio, R. H. in Bri-ol, P. (2009). The new implicit measures: An overview. V R. E. Petty, R. H. Fazio in P. Bri-ol (ur.), Attitudes: Insights from the new implicit measures (str. 3–18). New York: Psychology Press.
Rudman, L. A. (2011). Implicit measures for social and personality psychology. Thousand Oaks: Sage. CrossRef
Schmukle, S. C., Back, M. D. in Egloff, B. (2008). Validity of the five-factor model for the implicit self-concept of personality. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 24(4), 263–272. CrossRef
Schmukle, S. C. in Egloff, B. (2006). Assessing anxiety with Extrinsic Simon Tasks. Experimental Psychology, 53(2), 149–160. CrossRef
Schnabel, K., Asendorpf, J. B. in Greenwald, A. G. (2008). Using Implicit association tests for the assessment of implicit personality self-concept. V G. J. Boyle, G. Matthews in D. H. Saklofske (ur.), The SAGE handbook of personality theory and assessment: Vol. 2. Personality Measurement and Testing (str. 508–528). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Steffens, M. C. (2004). Is the Implicit association test immune to faking? Experimental Psychology, 51, 165–179. CrossRef
Steffens, M. C. in Schulze König, S. (2006). Predicting spontaneous Big-Five behaviour with Implicit association tests. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 22, 13–20. CrossRef
Strack, F. in Deutsch, R. (2004). Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 220–247. CrossRef
Wiers, R. W., van Woerden, N., Smulders, F .T. Y. in de Jong, P. J. (2002). Implicit and explicit alcohol-related cognitions in heavy and light drinkers. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 111, 648–658. CrossRef
Wittenbrink, B. in Schwarz, N. (2007). Introduction. V B. Wittenbrink in N. Schwarz (ur.), Implicit measures of attitudes (str. 1–13). New York: Guilford.
