Go to the article page in English / Pojdi na angleško stran članka
Okoljevarstvena psihologija kot raziskovalno področje
Polno besedilo (pdf) | Ogledi: 102 | 
Napisan v slovenščini. | Objavljeno: 13. januar 2016
https://doi.org/10.20419/2015.24.434 | Citati: CrossRef (0)
Povzetek: V zadnjih desetletjih narašča zavedanje o pomenu vpletenosti psihologije v okoljevarstveno problematiko. Na prelomu tisočletja se je oblikovalo novo raziskovalno področje, in sicer t. i. okoljevarstvena psihologija, katere namen je združevanje spoznanj temeljnih psiholoških panog s področja okoljevarstva in trajnostnega razvoja ter nadaljnjega bazičnega in aplikativnega raziskovanja na omenjenih področjih. Okoljevarstvena psihologija je novejša izpeljanka okoljske psihologije, s katero tvorita 34. oddelek Ameriškega psihološkega združenja (APA). Kljub porastu števila spoznanj z raziskovalnega področja okoljevarstvene psihologije le-ta v Sloveniji ni širše prepoznana in priznana, zato je glavni namen tega prispevka slovenske psihologe seznaniti z okoljevarstveno psihologijo kot raziskovalnim področjem znotraj temeljnih panog psihologije.
Ključne besede: okoljevarstvena psihologija, okoljevarstvo, raziskovalno področje
Citiraj:
Kalc, P. (2015). Okoljevarstvena psihologija kot raziskovalno področje [Conservation psychology as a field of study]. Psihološka obzorja, 24, 90–99. https://doi.org/10.20419/2015.24.434
Seznam literature v članku
Abrahamse, W. in Steg, L. (2013). Social influence approaches to encourage resource conservation: A meta-analysis. Global Environmental Change, 23, 1773–1785. CrossRef
Abrahamse, W., Steg, L., Vlek, C. in Rothengatter, T. (2005). A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25, 273–291. CrossRef
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211. CrossRef
Alisat, S., Norris, J. E., Pratt, M. W., Matsuba, M. K. in McAdams, D. P. (2014). Caring for the Earth: Generativity as a mediator for the prediction of environmental narratives from identity among activists and nonactivists. Identity: An International Journal of Theory and Research, 14(3), 177–194. CrossRef
APA Division 34: Society for environmental, population and conservation psychology. (2015). Conservation psychology. Pridobljeno 25. 7. 2015, s http://www.apadivisions.org/division-34/interests/conservation/
Blair, L. (2011). Ecopsychology and the person-centred approach: Exploring the relationship. Counselling Psychology Review, 26(1), 43–52.
Brook, A. T. (2001). What is »conservation psychology?« Population and Environmental Psychology Bulletin, 27(2), 1–2.
Castro, P. (2006). Applying social psychology to the study of environmental concern and environmental worldviews: Contributions from the social representations approach. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 16, 247–266. CrossRef
Castro, P. in Lima, M. L. (2001). Old and new ideas about the environment and science: An exploratory study. Environment and behavior, 33(3), 400–423. CrossRef
Charles, C. in Senauer, A. (2010). Health benefits to children from contact with the outdoors and nature. Pridobljeno s strani http://www.childrenandnature.org/downloads/C&NNHealthBenefits.pdf
Chawla, L. (1999). Life paths into effective environmental action. The Journal of Environmental Education, 31(1), 15–26. CrossRef
Chawla, L. (2007). Childhood experiences associated with care for the natural world: A theoretical framework for empirical results. Children, Youth and Environments, 17(4). 144–170.
Chawla, L. in Flanders Cushing, D. (2007). Education for strategic environmental behavior. Environmental Education Research, 13(4), 437‒452. CrossRef
Chawla, L. in Derr, V. (2012). The development of conservation behaviors in childhood and youth. V S. D. Clayton (ur.), The Oxford handbook of environmental and conservation psychology (str. 527–555). New York: Oxford University Press.
Cialdini, R. (2003). Crafting normative messages to protect the environment. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 105–109. CrossRef
Clayton, S. D. (2003). Environmental Identity Scale [Zapis v podatkovni zbirki]. Pridobljeno iz zbirke PsycTESTS.
Clayton, S. D. (2012a). Environment and identity. V S. D. Clayton (ur.), The Oxford handbook of environmental and conservation psychology (str. 164–180). New York, NY, ZDA: Oxford University Press.
Clayton, S. D. (2012b). Conclusion: Directions for the future. V S. D. Clayton (ur.), The Oxford handbook of environmental and conservation psychology (str. 673–683). New York: Oxford University Press.
Clayton, S. in Brook, A. (2005). Can psychology help save the world? A model for conservation psychology. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 5(1), 87–102. CrossRef
Clayton, S. D., Devine-Wright, P., Swim, J., Bonnes, M., Steg, L., Whitmarsh, L. in Carrico, A. (2015, 6. julij). Expanding the role for psychology in addressing environmental challenges. American Psychologist. CrossRef
Clayton, S., Litchfield, C. in Geller, S. E. (2013). Psychological science, conservation, and environmental sustainability. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 11(7), 377–382. CrossRef
Clayton, S. in Myers, G. (2009). Conservation psychology: Understanding and promoting human care for nature. Chichester, Združeno kraljestvo: Wiley-Blackwell.
Clayton, S. D. in Saunders, C. D. (2012). Introduction: Environmental and conservation psychology. V S. D. Clayton (ur.), The Oxford handbook of environmental and conservation psychology (str. 1–7). New York, NY, ZDA: Oxford University Press.
De Groot, J. in Steg, L. (2008). Value orientations to explain beliefs related to environmental significant behavior: How to measure egoistic, altruistic, and biospheric value orientations. Environment and Behavior, 40(3), 330–354. CrossRef
Dunlap, R. E. in Van Liere, K. D. (1978). The »new environmental paradigm«: A proposed measuring instrument and preliminary results. Journal of Environmental Education, 9, 10–19. CrossRef
Dunlap, R. E., Van Liere, K. D., Mertig, A. G., in Emmet Jones, R. (2000). Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: A revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 425–442. CrossRef
Fjørtoft, I. (2004). Landscape as playscape: The effects of natural environments on children's play and motor development. Children, Youth and Environments, 14(2), 21–44.
Gabrovšek, K. (2011). Ljudje z naravo, narava za ljudi. Biotska pestrost je naše življenje. Ljubljana, Slovenija: Zavod Republike Slovenije za varstvo narave.
Gifford, R. (2002). Environmental psychology: Principles and practice (3. izd.). Colville, WA, ZDA: Optimal Books.
Gifford, R. in Sussman, R. (2012). Environmental attitudes. V S. D. Clayton (ur.), The Oxford handbook of environmental and conservation psychology (str. 65–80). New York, NY, ZDA: Oxford University Press.
Goldstein, N. J., Cialdini, R. B. in Griskevicius, V. (2008). A room with a viewpoint: Using social norms to motivate environmental conservation in hotels. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 472–482. CrossRef
Göckeritz, S., Schultz, W. P., Rendón,T. Cialdini, R. B., Goldstein, N. J. in Griskevicius, V. (2010). Descriptive normative beliefs and conservation behavior: The moderating roles of personal involvement and injunctive normative beliefs. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 514–523.
Hawcroft, L. J. in Milfont, T. L. (2009). The use (and abuse) of the new environmental paradigm scale over the last 30 years: A meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 143–158. CrossRef
Hoelterhoff, M. (2010). Saving ecopsychology from itself: The need for scientific enquiry. History & Philosophy of Psychology, 12(1), 63–68.
Jia, F. Alisat, S. in Pratt, M. W. (2014). The relationship between identity, community involvement and generativity in a longitudinal study. Referat predstavljen leta 2014 na simpoziju pozitivne psihologije v Ottawi, Kanada. Predstavitev pridobljena 20. 12. 2015 s strani: http://www.positivepsychologycanada.com/Resources/Documents/Fanli,_CPP,July,%202014.pdf
Jia, F., Soucie, K., Alisat, S. in Pratt, M. W. (2015). Sowing seeds for future generations: Development of generative concern and its relation to environmental narrative identity. International Journal of Behavioral Development. 1–5. CrossRef
Kahn, P. H., Severson, R. L. in Ruckert, J. H. (2009). The human relation with nature and technological nature. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(1), 37–42. CrossRef
Kals, E., Schumacher, D. in Montada, L. (1999). Emotional affinity toward nature as a motivational basis to protect nature. Environment and Behavior, 31(2), 178–202. CrossRef
Mascia, M. B., Brosius, J. P., Dobson, T. A., Forbes, B. C., Horowitz, L., McKean, M. A. in Turner, N. J. (2003). Conservation and the social sciences. Conservation Biology, 17 (3), 649–650. CrossRef
Matsuba, M. K. in Pratt, M. W. (2013). The making of an environmental activist: A developmental psychological perspective. V M. K. Matsuba, P. E. King in K. C. Bronk (ur.), Exemplar methods and research: Strategies for investigation. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 142, 59–74. CrossRef
Matsuba, M. K., Pratt, M. W., Norris, J. E., Mohle, E., Alisat, S. in McAdams, D. P. (2012). Environmentalism as a context for expressing identity and generativity: Patterns among activists and uninvolved youth and midlife adults. Journal of Personality, 80(4), 1091–1115. CrossRef
Milfont, T. L. in Duckitt, J. (2010). The environmental attitudes inventory: A valid and reliable measure to assess the structure of environmental attitudes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 80–94. CrossRef
Myers, O. E. (2012). Children and nature. V S. D. Clayton (ur.), The Oxford handbook of environmental and conservation psychology (str. 113–127). New York, NY, ZDA: Oxford University Press.
Onwezen, M. C., Antonides, G. in Bartels, J. (2013). The norm activation model: An exploration of the functions of anticipated pride and guilt in pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Economic Psychology, 39, 141–153. CrossRef
Osbaldiston, R. in Schott, J. P. (2012). Environment sustainability and behavioral science: Meta-analysis of proenvironmental behavior experiments. Environment and Behavior, 44, 257–299. CrossRef
Oskamp, S. (2000). Psychological contributions to achieving an ecologically sustainable future for humanity. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 373–390. CrossRef
Polajnar Horvat, K. (2014). Vloga socialnih dejavnikov pri razvoju okoljske ozaveščenosti in spreminjanju okoljskega vedenja. Doktorska disertacija, Ljubljana: Univerza v Ljubljani, Filozofska fakulteta.
Saunders, C. D. (2003). The emerging field of conservation psychology. Human Ecology Review, 10(2), 137–149.
Sawitri, D. R., Hadyijanto, H. in Hadi, S. P. (2015). Pro-environmental behavior from a socialcognitive theory perspective. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 23, 27–33. CrossRef
Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values? Journal of Social Issues, 50(4), 19–45. CrossRef
Sommer, R. (2000). Discipline and field of study: A search for clarification. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 20, 1–4. CrossRef
Steg, L. in de Groot, J. I. M. (2012). Environmental values. V S. D. Clayton (ur.), The Oxford handbook of environmental and conservation psychology (str. 81–92). New York, NY, ZDA: Oxford University Press.
Steg, L., Perlaviciute, G., Van der Werff, E. in Lurvink, J. (2014). The significance of hedonic values for environmentally relevant attitudes, preferences, and actions. Environment and Behavior, 46(2), 163–192. CrossRef
Stern, P. C. (2000). Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 407–424. CrossRef
Stern, P., Dietz, T., Abel, T., Guagnano, G. A. in Kalof, L. (1999). A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism. Human Ecology Review, 6(2), 81–97.
Van der Werff, E., Steg, L. in Keizer, K. (2014). I am what I am, by looking past the present: The influence of biospheric values and past behavior on environmental self-identity. Environment and Behavior, 46(5), 626–657. CrossRef
Wals, A. E. J. (2012). Learning our way out of unsustainability: The role of environmental education.V S. D. Clayton (ur.), The Oxford handbook of environmental and conservation psychology (str. 628–644). New York: Oxford University Press.
Wells, N. in Lekies, K. (2006). Nature and the life course: Pathways from childhood nature experiences to adult environmentalism. Children, Youth, and Environments, 16(1), 1–24.
