This site uses cookies for user authentication, optional permanent login and monitoring the number of page views (Google Analytics).
Do you agree with cookies being used in accordance with our Privacy policy? You can change your decision regarding the use of cookies on the Privacy page.

I want to know more

Horizons of Psychology :: Psihološka obzorja

Scientific and Professional Psychological Journal of the Slovenian Psychologists' Association

Indexed in:
Scopus
PsycINFO
Academic OneFile

Member of DOAJ and CrossRef

sien
CONTENTS FOR AUTHORS ABOUT EDITORIAL BOARD LINKS

Search

My Account

Most viewed articles

 

« Back to Volume 9 (2000), Issue 4

flag Pojdi na slovensko stran članka / Go to the article page in Slovene


The Slovenian version of the Social Competence and Behavior Evaluation Scale – Preschool Edition (OLSP): the second preliminary validation

Maja Zupančič, Alenka Gril & Tina Kavčič

pdf Full text (pdf)  |  Views: 15  |  flagWritten in English.  |  Published: December 1, 2000

Abstract: The contribution presents the first part of the second validation study on the Slovenian version of the Social Competence and Behavior Evaluation Scale – Preschool Edition (OLSP). The study was implemented with a sample of 95 Slovenian kindergarten children aged from 2;6 to 6;5 years, uniformly sampled by age and gender. OLSP was filled out by the childrens' kindergarten teachers as well as their assisstants. The obtained results show that internal consistency and interrater reliability of the eight basic and the four composite scales of OLSP are satisfactory. No significant gender differences were obtained for any of the scales. The Dependent-Autonomous scale was positively related to the childrens' age, while the Internalizing Problems and General Adaptation composite scales related to age in the expected direction with medium effect sizes. However, the age differences on the latter did not reach statistical significance mainly due to small sample size.

Keywords: preschool children, social competence, reliability, age differences, gender differences


« Back to Volume 9 (2000), Issue 4