This site uses cookies for user authentication, optional permanent login and monitoring the number of page views (Google Analytics).
Do you agree with cookies being used in accordance with our Privacy policy? You can change your decision regarding the use of cookies on the Privacy page.

I want to know more

Horizons of Psychology :: Psihološka obzorja

Scientific and Professional Psychological Journal of the Slovenian Psychologists' Association

Indexed in:
Scopus
PsycINFO
Academic OneFile

Member of DOAJ and CrossRef

sien
CONTENTS FOR AUTHORS ABOUT EDITORIAL BOARD LINKS

Search

My Account

Most viewed articles

 

« Back to Volume 9 (2000), Issue 4

flag Pojdi na slovensko stran članka / Go to the article page in Slovene


Mead's analysis of symbolic interaction with some implications for the understanding of social reality

Matej Černigoj

pdf Full text (pdf)  |  Views: 13  |  flagWritten in Slovene.  |  Published: December 1, 2000

Abstract: The explanations of phenomena belonging to the domain of social reality have usually clustered around two opposing poles. Some authors considered them a mere reflection of the individual psychological characteristics of the society's members, while others considered them as being exclusively collective, thus transcending the level of individualistic psychology and explanation. Only a few authors, like G. H. Mead (1997/1934), saw that phenomena of social reality concurently shape the psychological characteristics of individuals and are produced in the process of their interaction. Such views were, however, condemned to misunderstanding, because the conceptual apparatus required for an efficient approach to the understanding of dynamical, self-organising systems, evolved only in the last decades. The aim of the article is to show how it is possible to explain the origin and the existence of the phenomena of social reality on the basis of some fundamental individual characteristics, while avoiding the pitfall of reductionism and not overlooking their transcendental nature.

Keywords: social reality, symbolic interaction, dynamical systems


« Back to Volume 9 (2000), Issue 4