This site uses cookies for user authentication, optional permanent login and monitoring the number of page views (Google Analytics).
Do you agree with cookies being used in accordance with our Privacy policy? You can change your decision regarding the use of cookies on the Privacy page.

I want to know more

Horizons of Psychology :: Psihološka obzorja

Scientific and Professional Psychological Journal of the Slovenian Psychologists' Association

Indexed in:
Scopus
PsycINFO
Academic OneFile

Member of DOAJ and CrossRef

sien
CONTENTS FOR AUTHORS ABOUT EDITORIAL BOARD LINKS

Search

My Account

Most viewed articles

 

« Back to Volume 22 (2013)

flag Pojdi na slovensko stran članka / Go to the article page in Slovene


Social acceptance of gifted pupils and pupils with additional professional help in elementary school

Marina Horvat & Katja Košir

pdf Full text (pdf)  |  Views: 523  |  flagWritten in Slovene.  |  Published: February 8, 2014

pdf https://doi.org/10.20419/2013.22.387  |  Cited By: CrossRef (1)

Abstract: Studies of peer relations in school settings are typically conducted on normative samples of pupils. Less is known about subgroups of pupils with some exceptionalities who may be more vulnerable to developing peer problems in school and are subsequently at risk for later maladjustment. The purpose of present study was therefore to examine social acceptance of gifted pupils and pupils with additional professional help in 6th and 8th-grade of regular elementary school. 194 pupils (50.5% girls) from 12 classes participated in the study; 16 of them (8.3%) were pupils with additional professional help (APH), 39 gifted pupils (20.1%) and one gifted pupil with APH. A composite positive and negative nomination sociometric procedure was employed. Most of the pupils with APH were in rejected and average sociometric group. Pupils with APH received the lowest number of positive and reciprocal nominations and the highest number of negative nominations. Compared to gifted pupils they were less accepted, although no difference in acceptance was found compared to the non-APH pupils. Results showed no significant differences in acceptance of pupils with APH in regard to grade level or gender. Gifted children received the highest number of positive and reciprocal and the lowest number of negative nominations. They were more likely to be average and popular, although no differences in acceptance was found compared to non-gifted pupils. Results suggest the importance of investigating subgroups of pupils with APH in future research.

Keywords: social acceptance, gifted students, students with additional professional help, sociometric groups, sociometry


Cite:
Horvat, M., & Košir, K. (2013). Socialna sprejetost nadarjenih učencev in učencev z dodatno strokovno pomočjo v osnovni šoli [Social acceptance of gifted pupils and pupils with additional professional help in elementary school]. Psihološka obzorja, 22, 156–166. https://doi.org/10.20419/2013.22.387


Reference list


Bagwell, C. L., Newcomb, A. F., & Bukowski, W. M. (1998). Preadolescent friendship and peer rejection as predictors of adult adjustment. Child Development, 69, 140–153. CrossRef

Bain, S. K., & Bell, S. M. (2004). Social self-concept, social attributions, and peer relationships in fourth, fifth, and sixth graders who are gifted compared to high achievers. Gifted Child Quarterly, 48, 167–178. CrossRef

Bakker, J. T. A., Denessen, E., Bosman, A. M. T., Krijger, E., & Bouts, L. (2007). Sociometric status and self-image of children with specific and general learning disabilities in Dutch general and special education classes. Learning Disability Quarterly, 30, 47–62. CrossRef

Baydik, B., & Bakkaloglu, H. (2009). Predictors of sociometric status for low socioeconomic status elementary mainstreamed students with and without special needs. Educational Science: Theory and Practice, 9, 435–447.

Bender, W. N., & Wall, M. E. (1994). Social-emotional development of students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 17, 323–341. CrossRef

Brody, L. E., & Persson Benbow, C. (1986). Social and emotional adjustment of adolescents extremely talented in verbal or mathematical reasoning. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 15, 1–18. CrossRef

Buhs, E. S., & Ladd, G. W. (2001). Peer rejection as an antecedent of young children's school adjustment: An examination of mediating processes. Developmental Psychology, 37, 550–560. CrossRef

Cohen, R., Duncan, M., & Cohen, S. L. (1994). Classroom peer relations of children participating in a pull-out enrichment program. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38, 33–37. CrossRef

Coie, J. D., Dodge, K. A., & Coppotelli, H. A. (1982). Dimensions and types of social status: A cross-age perspective. Developmental Psychology, 18, 557–570. CrossRef

Conderman, G. (1995). Social status of sixth- and seventh-grade students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 18, 13–24. CrossRef

Dudley-Marling, C. C., & Edmiaston, R. (1985). Social status of learning disabled children and adolescents: A review. Learning Disability Quarterly, 8, 189–204. CrossRef

Estell, D. B., Farmer, T. W., Irvin, M. J., Crowther, A., Akos, P., & Boudah, D. J. (2009). Students with exceptionalities and the peer group context of bullying and victimization in late elementary school. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 18, 136–150. CrossRef

Gadeyne, E., Ghesquière, P., & Onghena, P. (2004). Psychosocial functioning of young children with learning problems. Journal of Child Psychology in Psychiatry, 45, 510–521. CrossRef

Gallagher, J. J. (1958). Peer acceptance of highly gifted children in elementary schools. The Elementary School Journal, 58, 465–470. CrossRef

Gifford-Smith, M. E., & Brownell, C. A. (2003). Childhood peer relationships: Social acceptance, friendship, and peer networks. Journal of School Psychology, 41, 235–284. CrossRef

Guralnick, M. J. (1999). The nature and meaning of social integration for young children with mild developmental delays in inclusive settings. Journal of Early Intervention, 22, 70–86. CrossRef

Hoovegeen, L., van Hell, J. G., & Verhoeven, L. (2009). Self-concept and social status of accelerated and nonaccelerated students in the first 2 years of secondary school in the Netherlands. Gifted Child Quarterly, 53, 50–67.CrossRef

Hoyle, S. G., & Serafica, F. C. (1988). Peer status of children with and without learning disabilities: A multimethod study. Learning Disability Quarterly, 11, 322–332. CrossRef

Jackson, L. D., & Bracken, B. A. (1998). Relationship between students' social status and global and domain-specific self-concepts. Journal of School Psychology, 36, 233–246. CrossRef

Jeriček, H. (2003). Nadarjenost – privilegij ali breme? V M. Blažič (ur.), Nadarjeni med teorijo in prakso – zbornik prispevkov (str. 92–100). Novo Mesto: Slovensko združenje za nadarjene Novo Mesto.

Juvonen, J., & Bear, G. (1992). Social adjustment of children with and without learning disabilities in integrated classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 322–300. CrossRef

Kalambouka, A., Farrell, P., Dyson, A., & Kaplan, I. (2007). The impact of placing pupils with special needs in mainstream schools on the achievement of their peers. Educational Research, 49, 365–382. CrossRef

Kobal Grum, D., Kobal, B., Celeste, M., Dremelj, P., Smolej, S., & Nagode, M. (2009). Sociopsihološki vidiki izobraževanja oseb s posebnimi potrebami (znanstveno poročilo). Ljubljana: Pedagoški inštitut.

Košir, K. (2005). Zavrnjeni učenci: Kako jim pomagati in zakaj je to potrebno? Vzgoja in izobraževanje, 36, 43–46.

Kuhne, M., & Wiener, J. (2000). Stability of social status of children with and without learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 23, 64–75. CrossRef

Ladd, G. W., & Troop-Gordon, W. (2003). The role of chronic peer difficulties in the development of children's psychological adjustment problems. Child development, 74, 1344–1367. CrossRef

Litster, K., & Roberts, J. (2011). The self-concepts and perceived competencies of gifted and non-gifted students: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 11, 130–140. CrossRef

Opara, B. (2005). Otroci s posebnimi potrebami v vrtcih in šolah: Vloga in naloga vrtcev in šol pri vzgoji in izobraževanju otrok s posebnimi potrebami. Ljubljana: Centerkontura.

Opara, B., Barle Lakota, A., Globačnik, B., Kobal Grum, D., Košir, S., Macedoni Lukšič, M., Zorc, D., Bregar Golobič, K., Molan, N, Vovk Ornik, N., & Klavžar, K. (2010). Analiza vzgoje in izobraževanja otrok s posebnimi potrebami v Sloveniji. Ljubljana: JZR Pedagoški inštitut.

Peairs, K. F. (2011). The social world of gifted adolescents: Sociometric status, friendship and social network centrality (doktorska disertacija). Duke University, Durham.

Pečjak, S., & Košir, K. (2008). Poglavja iz pedagoške psihologije: Izbrane teme. Ljubljana: Oddelek za psihologijo Filozofske fakultete.

Renzulli, J.S. (1986). The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for creative productivity. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (ur.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 53–92). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Rimm, S. (2002). Peer pressures and social acceptance of gifted children. V M. Neihart, S. M. Reis, N. M. Robinson in S. M. Moon (ur.), The social and emotional development of gifted children: What do we know? (str. 13–19). Washington: The National Association for Gifted Children.

Rutland, A., Cameron, L., Jugert, P., Nigbur, D., Brown, R., Watters, C., … Le Touze, D. (2012). Group identity and peer relations: A longitudinal study of group identity, perceived peer acceptance, and friendships amongst ethnic minority English children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 30, 283–302. CrossRef

Schmidt, M. (2001). Socialna integracija otrok s posebnimi potrebami v osnovno šolo. Maribor: Pedagoška fakulteta Maribor.

Stone, W. L., & La Greca, A. M. (1990). The social status of children with learning disabilities: A reexamination. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 32–37. CrossRef

Subotnik, R. F., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Worrell, F. C. (2011). Rethinking giftedness and gifted education: A proposed direction forward based on psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12, 3–54. CrossRef

Travers, J. F., Elliott, S. N., & Kratochwill, T. R. (1993). Educational psychology: Effective teaching, effective learning. Madison: Brown & Benchmark.

Wiener, J., Harris, P. J., & Shirer, C. (1990). Achievement and social-behavioral correlates of peer status in LD children. Learning Disability Quarterly, 13, 114–127. CrossRef

Wiener, J., & Schneider, B. H. (2002). A multisource exploration of the friendship patterns of children with and without learning disabilities. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 30, 127–141. CrossRef

Wiener, J., & Tardif, C. Y. (2004). Social and emotional functioning of children with learning disabilities: Does special education placement make a difference? Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 19, 20–32. CrossRef

Zakon o usmerjanju otrok k posebnimi potrebami, Uradni list RS, 118/2006. (2006). Pridobljeno 14.07.2013 na: http://www.zrss.si/pdf/050911092746_upp_zakon_url_03_2007_zuopp-upb1.pdf.


Cited By via CrossRef (1)

Primary school teachers’ opinions towards musically gifted students
       Vesna Svalina, Blaženka Bačlija Sušić, Goran Lapat
       Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 2021
       https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/21.79.133


« Back to Volume 22 (2013)