This site uses cookies for user authentication, optional permanent login and monitoring the number of page views (Google Analytics).
Do you agree with cookies being used in accordance with our Privacy policy? You can change your decision regarding the use of cookies on the Privacy page.

I want to know more

Horizons of Psychology :: Psihološka obzorja

Scientific and Professional Psychological Journal of the Slovenian Psychologists' Association

Indexed in:
Scopus
PsycINFO
Academic OneFile

Member of DOAJ and CrossRef

sien
CONTENTS FOR AUTHORS ABOUT EDITORIAL BOARD LINKS

Search

My Account

Most viewed articles

 

« Back to Volume 23 (2014)

flag Pojdi na slovensko stran članka / Go to the article page in Slovene


Seeing beyond statistics: Examining the potential for disjuncture between legislation, policy and practice in meeting the needs of highly able Scottish students

Niamh Stack & Margaret Sutherland

pdf Full text (pdf)  |  Views: 93  |  flagWritten in English.  |  Published: March 29, 2015

pdf https://doi.org/10.20419/2014.23.415  |  Cited By: CrossRef (0)

Abstract: The question of how best to identify and provide for gifted students has a long and contentious history internationally. In contrast to other countries where there are specialist programmes and in some cases specialist teachers for gifted pupils, Scotland has chosen to adopt an inclusive approach to provision for these students and has created a legislative and curricular framework that in theory provides a strong structure for meeting their educational and developmental needs. While there are significant benefits to this approach, care must be taken to ensure that within the space between intention and practice the needs of these learners have been explicitly identified, considered and met. Each year the Scottish Government conducts a census to collect data from all publically funded schools in Scotland. In accordance with Scottish legislation as part of this process it gathers data pertaining to pupils identified as requiring additional support for their learning, including highly able pupils. However there are anomalies within this data, for example, there are unusual and unexplained discrepancies between the proportions of pupils identified as being highly able in different geographical contexts. The purpose of the present study was therefore to examine the potential causes for these anomalies and to assess the implications for the identification of, and provision for, highly able pupils in Scotland. Thirteen structured telephone interviews were conducted with Local Education Authority personnel across Scotland. These interviews aimed to get behind the statistics and examine how highly able pupils are identified, and provided for, in practice. Several interesting issues emerged from the interviews that may begin to help to explain the anomalies and to help us better understand everyday practice. The results, while encouraging, suggest that there is a need for teachers, educational psychologists, schools and authorities to ensure that the needs of this group of learners are explicitly considered.

Keywords: Scottish Schools Census Data, gifted, education, inclusion


Cite:
Stack, N., & Sutherland, M. (2014). Seeing beyond statistics: Examining the potential for disjuncture between legislation, policy and practice in meeting the needs of highly able Scottish students. Psihološka obzorja, 23, 145–154. https://doi.org/10.20419/2014.23.415


Reference list


Bégin, J., & Gagné, F. (1994a). Predictors of attitudes toward gifted education: A review of the literature and a blueprint for future research. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 17, 161–179. CrossRef

Bégin, J., & Gagné, F. (1994b). Predictors of general attitude toward gifted education. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 18, 74–86. CrossRef

Borland, J. H. (2005). Gifted education without gifted children: The case for no conception of giftedness. In R. Sternberg & J. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 1–19). New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef

Brody, L., & Stanley, J. (2005). Youths who reason exceptionally well mathematically and or verbally. In R. Sternberg & J. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 20–37). New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef

Claxton, G., & Meadows, S. (2009) Brightening up: How children learn to be gifted. In T. Balchin, B. Hymer, & D. J. Matthews (Eds.), The Routledge International Companion to gifted education (pp. 3–17). London, England: Routledge.

Cramond, B. (2004). Can we, should we, need we agree on a definition of giftedness? Roeper Review, 27, 15–17. CrossRef

Donaldson, G. (2011). Teaching Scotland's Future. Edinburgh, Scotland: HMSO.

Drummond, M. J., & Yarker, P. (2013). Editorial: The enduring problem of fixed ability: But is a new conversation beginning? FORUM, 55(1), 3–7. CrossRef

Education Scotland (n.d. a). What is Curriculum for Excellence? Retrieved from http://www.educationscotland.gov.uk/thecurriculum/whatiscurriculumforexcellence/

Education Schotland (n.d. b). Additional Support Needs. Retrieved from http://www.educationscotland.gov.uk/supportinglearners/additionalsupportneeds/

Education Scotland (n.d. c). Universal Support. Retrieved from http://www.educationscotland.gov.uk/supportinglearners/whatissupport/targetedsupport/index.asp

Education Scotland (n.d. d). Targeted Support. Retrieved from http://www.educationscotland.gov.uk/supportinglearners/whatissupport/universalsupport/index.asp

Education (Additional Support for Learning) (Scotland) Act 2004 (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.legislation.gov.uk/asp/2004/4

Education (Additional Support for Learning) (Scotland) Act 2009 (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.legislation.gov.uk/asp/2009/7

Florian, L., & Kershner, R. (2009). Inclusive pedagogy. In H. Daniels, H. Lauder, & J. Porter (Eds.), Knowledge, values and educational policy: A critical perspective (pp. 173–183). London, England: Routledge.

Freeman, J. (2013). The long-term effects of families and educational provision on gifted children. Educational & Child Psychology, 30(2), 7–17.

Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind. New York, NY, USA: Basic Books.

Geake, J., & Gross, M. U. M. (2008). Teachers' negative affect toward academically gifted students: An evolutionary psychological study. Gifted Child Quarterly, 52(3), 217–231. CrossRef

Gross, M. U. M. (1997). Changing teacher attitudes towards gifted children: An early but essential step. In J. Chan, R. Li & J. Spinks (Eds.), Maximising potential: Lengthening and strengthening our stride (pp. 3–22). Hong Kong, China: World Council for Gifted and Talented Children.

Head, G. (2011). Inclusion and Pedagogy. In M. McMahon, C. Forde, & M. Martin (Eds.), Contemporary Issues in Learning and Teaching (pp. 60–72). London, England: Sage Publications. CrossRef

Head, G., & Pirrie, A. (2007). The place of special schools in a policy climate of inclusion. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 7(2), 90–96. CrossRef

McClain, M. C., & Pfeiffer, S. (2012). Identification of gifted students in the United States today: A look at state definitions, policies, and practices. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 28(1), 59–88. CrossRef

McCulloch, M. (2011). Interprofessional approaches to practice. In M. McMahon, C. Forde, & M.Martin (Eds.), Contemporary issues in learning and teaching (pp. 169–174). London, England: Sage Publications. CrossRef

Milik, A., & Boylan, M. (2013). Valuing choice as an alternative to fixed-ability thinking and teaching in primary mathematics. FORUM, 55(1), 161–172.CrossRef

Montgomery, D. (2003). Gifted and talented with special educational needs: Double exceptionality. London, England: NACE Fulton Publication.

Pfeiffer, S. I. (2003). Challenges and opportunities for students who are gifted: What the experts say. Gifted Child Quarterly, 47, 161–169.CrossRef

Radnor, H., Koshy, V., & Taylor, A. (2007). Gifts, talents and meritocracy. Journal of Education Policy, 22(3), 283–99. CrossRef

Renzulli, J. S. (2005). The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for promoting creative productivity. In R. J. Sternberg & J. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 217–245). Boston, MA, USA: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef

Resing, W. C. M., Lauchlan, F., & Elliott, J. G. (2013). Guest Editorial. Educational and Child Psychology, 30(2), 5–6.

Scotland's Education System (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.gtcs.org.uk/education-in-scotland/scotlands-education-system.aspx

Scottish Government (2012). The National framework for inclusion. Edinburgh, Scotland: HMSO.

Scottish Government (2006a). Getting it right for every child. Edinburgh, Scotland:HMSO Scottish Government (2006b). Building the curriculum 3. Edinburgh, Scotland: HMSO.

Scottish Network for Able Pupils (2009). Non-statutory guidance for schools. Glasgow, Scotland: Author.

Scottish Office Education and Industry Department (1993). The education of able pupils P6-S2. Edinburgh, Scotland: HMSO.

Smith, C. (2005). Including the gifted and talented: Making inclusion work for more able learners. London, England: Routledge.

Sternberg, R. (2005). The WICS model of giftedness. In R. Sternberg & J. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 327–42). New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef

Sternberg, R. (2009). Wisdom, intelligence, creativity synthesized: A model of giftedness. In. T. Balchin, B. Hymer, & D. Matthews (Eds.), The Routledge International Companion to gifted education (pp. 255–64). London, England: Routledge. CrossRef

Sternberg, R., & Davidson, J. (2005). Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed.). New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef

Stephens, K. (2008). Applicable federal and state policy, law, and legal considerations in gifted education. In S. I. Pfeiffer (Ed.), Handbook of giftedness in children (pp. 387–408). New York, NY, USA: Springer. CrossRef

Stephens, K., & Karnes, F. A. (2000). State definitions for the gifted and talented revisited. Exceptional Children, 66, 219–238.

Subotnik, R. F. (2003). A developmental view of giftedness: From being to doing. Roeper Review, 26, 14–15. CrossRef

Sutherland, M. (2011a). Highly able pupils in Scotland: Making curriculum change count Journal of the Institute for Educational Research, 43, 2.

Sutherland, M. (2011b). The Early Years educator: A key contributor to effective practice for highly able young children. TalentEd, 27, 1–11.

Sutherland, M., & Stack, N. (2014). Ability as an additional support need: Scotland's inclusive approach to gifted education. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 4(3), 73–87.

Tomlinson, S. (2008). Gifted, talented and high ability: Selection for education in a one-dimensional world. Oxford Review of Education, 34(1), 59–74. CrossRef

Van Tassel-Baska, J. (2005). Domain-specific giftedness: Applications in school and life. In R. Sternberg & J. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 358–376). New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef

VanTassel-Baska, J., Feng, A., & Evans, B. (2007). Patterns of identification and performance among gifted students identified through performance tasks: A three-year analysis. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51, 218–231. CrossRef


« Back to Volume 23 (2014)