This site uses cookies for user authentication, optional permanent login and monitoring the number of page views (Google Analytics).
Do you agree with cookies being used in accordance with our Privacy policy? You can change your decision regarding the use of cookies on the Privacy page.

I want to know more

Horizons of Psychology :: Psihološka obzorja

Scientific and Professional Psychological Journal of the Slovenian Psychologists' Association

Indexed in:
Scopus
PsycINFO
Academic OneFile

Member of DOAJ and CrossRef

sien
CONTENTS FOR AUTHORS ABOUT EDITORIAL BOARD LINKS

Search

My Account

Most viewed articles

 

« Back to Volume 23 (2014)

flag Pojdi na slovensko stran članka / Go to the article page in Slovene


Talent identification in Hungary: From identification to investigation

Szilvia Péter-Szarka

pdf Full text (pdf)  |  Views: 60  |  flagWritten in English.  |  Published: March 29, 2015

pdf https://doi.org/10.20419/2014.23.416  |  Cited By: CrossRef (0)

Abstract: This article provides an outline of talent identification practices and challenges in Hungary. First, it gives a summary of gifted education in the country; then the general challenges of talent identification are introduced: difficulties of defining talent, talent as potential, environmental factors, the role of perseverance and motivation, and individual variety. Later, recent Hungarian identification practices are shown, followed by a summary and a conclusion about how our identification practice should be developed into an investigation of individual characetristics. We propose stronger focus on the use of cognitive profile tests, investigation of interest-based characteristics, the use of observation and dynamic assessment methods, teacher nomination and emphasizing the need for effort. The focus from identification toward investigation exploring individual needs and characteristics to provide the most appropriate pathway for development in the 21st century seems to be a more effective way of talent support than mere selection.

Keywords: talented, identification, Hungary, investigation, environmental factors


Cite:
Péter-Szarka, S. (2014). Talent identification in Hungary: From identification to investigation. Psihološka obzorja, 23, 155–162. https://doi.org/10.20419/2014.23.416


Reference list


LXXIX. Act of Public Education (1993). Retrieved from http://www.okm.gov.hu/letolt/kozokt/kozokt_tv_070823.pdf

CXC. Act of National Public Education (2011). Retrieved from http://njt.hu/cgi_bin/njt_doc.cgi?docid=139880.226439

Csikszentmihalyi. M. (1985). Emergent motivation and the evolution of the self. In D. Kleiber & M.H. Maehr (Eds.), Motivation in Adulthood (pp. 93–119). Greenwich, CT, USA: JAI Press.

Csíkszentmihályi, M. (2009). A systems perspective on creativity and its implications for measurement. In E. Villalba (Ed.), Can creativity be measured? International conference volume (pp. 407–414). Brussels, Belgium: European Commission, Directorate-General for Education and Culture, Centre for Research on Lifelong Learning. Retrieved from http://bookshop.europa.eu/en/measuring-creativity-pbLBNA24033/

Duckworth, A. L., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2005). Self-discipline outdoes IQ in predicting academic performance of adolescents. Psychological Science, 16(12), 939–944. CrossRef

Dweck, C. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York, NY, USA: Ballantine Books.

Elliot, A. J., Murayama, K., & Pekrun, R. (2011). A 3X2 Achievement Goal Model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(3), 632–648. CrossRef

Ericsson, K. A. (1998). The scientific study of expert levels of performance: General implications for optimal learning and creativity. High Ability Studies, 9, 75–100. CrossRef

Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Romer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100(3), 363–406. CrossRef

Fitts, W. H. (1965). Manual for the Tennesse Self Concept Scale. Nashville, TN, USA: Counselor Recordings and Tests.

Fuszek, C. (2014). An overview of the current status of talent care and talent support in Hungary. CEPS Journal, 4(3), 55–71.

Fuszek, C., Arató, F., Balogh, L., Bodnár, G., Gyarmathy, É., Péter-Szarka, S., & Vass, V. (2014). Ez is tehetséggondozás! [It is also talent support!]. Iskolakultúra, 4, 100–120.

Gagne, F. (2008). Building gifts into talents: Overview of the DMGT. Retreived from http://www.sfu.ca/~kanevsky/428/Gagne.pdf

Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York, NY, USA: Basic Books.

Griffin, N. S., McKenzie, J. (1993). Nebraska Starry Night: A behavior-based observation protocol, version 8.893. Lincoln, NE, USA: University of Nebraska-Lincoln.

Gyarmathy, É. (2014). A nem szunnyadó erő: A tehetség fogalmának átgondolása [Power that is not sleeping: Rethinking the concept of giftedness]. Neveléstudomány, 2, 67–81. Retreived from http://nevelestudomany.elte.hu/downloads/2014/nevelestudomany_2014_2_67-81.pdf

Gyarmathy, É., & Herskovits, M. (1999). Képességek vizsgálata az érdeklődés térképének segítségével [Investigation of abilities with the help of mapping interests]. Pszichológia, 19(4), 437–458.

Kozéki, B. & Entwistle, N. J. (1986): Tanulási motivációk és orientációk vizsgálata magyar és skót iskoláskorúak körében [Examination of learning motivation and orientation among Hungarian and Scottish students]. Pszichológia, 6(2), 271–292.

Mönks, F. J. (1992). Development of gifted children: The issue of identification and programming. In F. J. Mönks, W. A. M. Peters (Eds.), Talent for the future (pp. 191–202). Assen/Maastricht, Netherlands: Van Gorcum.

Pappné Gyulai, K., & Pakurár, M. (2011). A debreceni példa. Tehetségazonosítás és tehetséggondozás a város közoktatási intézményeiben [The example of Debrecen. Talent identification and talent development in the public schools of the town]. Budapest, Hungary: Magyar Tehetségsegítő Szervezetek Szövetsége.

Péter-Szarka, S. (2012). Creative climate as a means to promote creativity in the classroom. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 10(3), 1011–1034.

Péter-Szarka, S. (2013). Guidelines for the assessment of creativity. ECHA News, 27(2), 8–9.

Renzulli, J. S. (1986). The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for creative productivity. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 53–92). New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.

Renzulli, J. (1998). Three-ring conception of giftedness. In S. M. Baum, S. M., Reis, & L. R. Maxfield (Eds.), Nurturing the gifts and talents of primary grade students. Mansfield Center, CT, USA: Creative Learning Press. Retrieved from http://www.gifted.uconn.edu/sem/semart13.html

Renzulli, J. S., Smith, L. H., White, A. J., Callahan, C. M., Hartman, R. K., & Westberg, K. L. (2002). Scales for rating the behavioral characteristics of superior students – revised edition. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.

Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press.

Smythe, I (2002). Cognitive factors underlying reading and spelling difficulties: A cross linguistic study (Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy). Department of Psychology, School of Human Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.

Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., Lushene, R., Vagg, P. R., & Jacobs, G. A. (1983). Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Palo Alto, CA, USA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

Sternberg, R. J. (1997). Successful intelligence. New York, NY, USA: Plume.

Sternberg, R., Davidson, J. (Eds.) (2005). Conceptions of Giftedness. New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef

Sternberg, R. J., & Kaufman, S. B. (Eds.) (2011). The Cambridge handbook of intelligence. New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef

Subotnik, R. F., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Worrell, F. C. (2011). Rethinking giftedness and gifted education: A proposed direction forward based on psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12(1), 3–54. CrossRef

Tóth L., & Király Z. (2006). Új módszer a kreativitás megállapítására: A Tóth-féle Kreativitást Becslő Skála [A new method for the assessment of creativity: The Tóth Creativity Assessment Scale]. Magyar Pedagógia, 106(4), 287–311.

Urban, K. K. (2005). Assessing creativity: The Test for Creative Thinking - Drawing Production (TCT-DP). International Education Journal, 6(2), 272–280.

Vallerand, R., Pelletier, L., Blais, M., Briere, N., Senecal, C., & Vallieres, E. (1992). The Academic Motivation Scale: A measure of intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivation in education. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 1003–1017. CrossRef

Ziegler, A. (2004). The Actiotope Model of Giftedness. Retrieved from http://www.psycho.ewf.uni-erlangen.de/mitarbeiter/ziegler/publikationen/Publikation02a.pdf

Ziegler, A. (2005). The Actiotope Model of Giftedness. In R.J. Sternberg & J.E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of Giftedness (pp. 411–436). New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef


« Back to Volume 23 (2014)