This site uses cookies for user authentication, optional permanent login and monitoring the number of page views (Google Analytics).
Do you agree with cookies being used in accordance with our Privacy policy? You can change your decision regarding the use of cookies on the Privacy page.

I want to know more

Horizons of Psychology :: Psihološka obzorja

Scientific and Professional Psychological Journal of the Slovenian Psychologists' Association

Indexed in:
Scopus
PsycINFO
Academic OneFile

Member of DOAJ and CrossRef

sien
CONTENTS FOR AUTHORS ABOUT EDITORIAL BOARD LINKS

Search

My Account

Most viewed articles

 

« Back to Volume 9 (2000), Issue 1

flag Pojdi na slovensko stran članka / Go to the article page in Slovene


Evaluation of grading in Matura examination in mathematics

Anja Poljanšek

pdf Full text (pdf)  |  Views: 13  |  flagWritten in Slovene.  |  Published: March 1, 2000

Abstract: Students can choose between two options of Matura examination in mathematics: basic and higher level. At both levels written and oral exams are taken. The basic-level written exam contains only Paper 1, whereas the higher-level exam contains Paper 1 and Paper 2. For each exam answers are scored. Using different linear combinations of scores for the two levels, grades are formed. Some extra points are later added to higher-level grades. Using data from the 1998 spring examination, we looked into such an assessment and evaluated the validity of classical scoring, weighted sums combining, and a score-to-grade transformation. Although classical scoring seems to have a satisfactory validity, the last two procedures need to be improved.

Keywords: Matura, measurement, difficulty levels, classical test scoring, item-response theory, Slovenia


« Back to Volume 9 (2000), Issue 1