This site uses cookies for user authentication, optional permanent login and monitoring the number of page views (Google Analytics).
Do you agree with cookies being used in accordance with our Privacy policy? You can change your decision regarding the use of cookies on the Privacy page.

I want to know more

Horizons of Psychology :: Psihološka obzorja

Scientific and Professional Psychological Journal of the Slovenian Psychologists' Association

Indexed in:
Scopus
PsycINFO
Academic OneFile

Member of DOAJ and CrossRef

sien
CONTENTS FOR AUTHORS ABOUT EDITORIAL BOARD LINKS

Search

My Account

Most viewed articles

 

« Back to Volume 28 (2019)

flag Pojdi na slovensko stran članka / Go to the article page in Slovene


Well-being factors measurement in youth in Slovenia: psychometric properties of the measure MDI and two dimensions of the measure EPOCH

Ana Kozina & Valentina Čufar

pdf Full text (pdf)  |  Views: 125  |  flagWritten in Slovene.  |  Published: December 30, 2019

pdf https://doi.org/10.20419/2019.28.504  |  Cited By: CrossRef (0)

Abstract: Well-being has gained importance in psychological research as well as in the field of education. However, there is a lack of validated questionnaires in Slovenia that would measure well-being in different domains in childhood and youth. In the present paper we focused on psychometric properties of two children and adolescent well-being measures: Middle Years Development Instrument (MDI; Schonert-Reichl et al., 2013) and Measure of Adolescent Well-Being (EPOCH; Kern, Benson, Steinberg, & Steinberg, 2016). In order to validate the questionnaires, their structure, reliability and convergent and discriminant validity were analysed. Analyses were conducted on PISA 2015 subsample for Slovenia in an additional well-being study, with sample size 3224 (age: M = 16.65; SD = 4.19 years). Confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) were conducted separately for MDI and two dimensions of EPOCH. CFA indicated adequate fit for all expected models. Results showed satisfactory internal reliability of all subscales (alpha coefficients ranged from 0.72 to 0.92). Our research demonstrates evidence for convergent and discriminant validity (correlations between subscales, correlations with PYD questionnaire and with gender). The validation of presented measures speaks in favour of use of these questionnaires for studying factors of well-being in Slovenia.

Keywords: well-being, adolescents, psychometric properties, test validity, positive psychology


Cite:
Kozina, A., & Čufar, V. (2019). Merjenje napovednikov blagostanja med mladostniki v Sloveniji: psihometrične značilnosti mere MDI in dimenzij mere EPOCH [Well-being factors measurement in youth in Slovenia: psychometric properties of the measure MDI and two dimensions of the measure EPOCH]. Psihološka obzorja, 28, 123–136. https://doi.org/10.20419/2019.28.504


Reference list


Avsec, A., & Sočan, G. (2009). Validacija slovenske oblike Vprašalnika psihološkega blagostanja RPWB. Psihološka obzorja, 18(4), 4–19.

Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Harvard university press.

Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York, NY, ZDA: Guilford Press.

Bullinger, M., Brütt, AL., Erhart, M., Ravens-Sieberer, U., & BELLA Study Group. (2008). Psychometric properties of the KINDL-R questionnaire: results of the BELLA study. European Child Adolescent Psychiatry, 17, 125–132. CrossRef

Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. New York, NY, ZDA: Taylor & Francis Group.

Cooke, P. J., Melchert, T. P., & Connor, K. (2016). Measuring well-being: A review of instruments. The Counseling Psychologist, 44(5), 730–757. CrossRef

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Finding flow: The psychology of engagement with everyday life. Basic Books.

Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Seligman, M. E. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55(1), 5–14. CrossRef

Cummins, R. A.,, & Lau, A. L. D. (2005). Personal Well-Being Index- School Children (PWI-SC) manual (3rd ed.). Melbourne, Australia: Deakin University.

Čufar, V., Kramaršek, P., Mahne, N., & Mohar, N. (2015). Vpliv pozitivnih intervencij na povečanje dobrega počutja. V Čufar, V., Kramaršek, P. in Mahne, N. (ur.), Raziskave študentov psihologije prve stopnje: Zbornik znanstveno-raziskovalnih prispevkov (str. 6–15). Maribor, Slovenija: Filozofska fakulteta.

Diener, E., Emmons, R, Larsen, R., & Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction with Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 1105–1117. CrossRef

Eccles, J. S. (1999). The development of children ages 6 to 14. Future of Children, 9(2), 30–44. CrossRef

Geldof, G. J., Bowers, E. P., Boyd, M. J., Mueller, M. K., Napolitano, C. M., Schmidt, K. L., … Lerner, R. M. (2014). Creation of short and very short measures of the five C's of positive youth development. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 24(1), 163–176. CrossRef

Greenberg, M. T., Weissberg, R. P., O'Brien, M. U., Zins, J. E., Fredericks, L., Resnik, H., & Elias, M. J. (2003). Enhancing school-based prevention and youth development through coordinated social, emotional, and academic learning. American Psychologist, 58(6-7), 466–474. CrossRef

Hills, P., & Argyle, M. (2002). The Oxford Happiness Questionnaire: a compact scale for the measurement of psychological well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 33(7), 1073–1082. CrossRef

Huppert, F. A., & So, T. T. C. (2013). Flourishing across Europe: Application of a new conceptual framework for defining well-being. Social Indicators Research, 110(3), 837–861. CrossRef

Kern, M. L., Benson, L., Steinberg, E. A., & Steinberg, L. (2016). The EPOCH measure of adolescent well-being. Psychological Assessment, 28(5), 586–597. CrossRef

Kern, M. L., Waters, L. E., Adler, A., & White, M. A. (2015). A multidimensional approach to measuring well-being in students: Application of the PERMA framework. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 10(3), 262–271. CrossRef

Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modelling. New York, NY, ZDA: Guilford.

Kozina, A., & Štraus, M. (2017). Relationship between academic achievement as measured in the PISA study and wellbeing indicators: Preliminary findings. Šolsko polje, 28, 185–212.

Kozina, A., Wiium, N., Gonzalez, J. M., & Dimitrova, R. (2018). Positive youth development and academic achievement in Slovenia. Child & Youth Care Forum, 1–18. CrossRef

Lerner, R. M. (2007). The good teen: Rescuing adolescence from the myths of the storm and stress years. New York: Crown Publishing.

Lerner, R. M., von Eye, A., Lerner, J. V., & Lewin-Bizan, S. (2009). Exploring the foundations and functions of adolescent thriving within the 4-H study of positive youth development: A view of the issues. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30(5), 567–570. CrossRef

Masten, A. S. (2001). Ordinary magic: Resilience processes in development. American Psychologist, 56(3), 227–238. CrossRef

Matthews, N., Kilgour, L., Christian, P., Mori, K., & Hil, D. M. (2015). Understanding, evidencing, and promoting adolescent well-being: An emerging agenda for schools. Youth & Society, 47(5), 659–683. CrossRef

Musek, J. (2015). Osebnost, vrednote in psihično blagostanje. Ljubljana, Slovenija: Znanstvena založba Filozofske fakultete Univerze v Ljubljani.

Ng, Z. J., Huebner, S. E.,, & Hills, K. J. (2015). Life satisfaction and academic performance in early adolescents: Evidence for reciprocal association. Journal of School Psychology, 53(6), 497–491. CrossRef

OECD (2017). How's life? 2017: Measuring well-being. Pariz, Francija: Avtor. Pridobljeno s http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/how_life-2017-en CrossRef

Opree, S. J., Buijzen, M., & Reijmersdal, E.A. (2018). Development and validation of the psychological well-being scale for children (PWB-C). Societies, 8(18), 1–14. CrossRef

Peterson, C., Park, N., & Seligman, M. E. (2005). Orientations to happiness and life satisfaction: The full life versus the empty life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 6(1), 25–41. CrossRef

Phelps, E., Zimmerman, S., Warren, A.E.A., Jeličić, H., von Eye, A.,, & Lerner, R. M. (2009). The structure and developmental course of positive youth development (PYD) in early adolescence: Implications for theory and practice. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30(5), 571–584. CrossRef

Ravens-Sieberer, U., & Bullinger, M. (1998). Assessing health-related quality of life in chronically ill children with the German KINDL: first psychometric and content analytical results. Quality of Life Research, 7(5), 399–407. CrossRef

Ravens-Sieberer, U., Gosch, A., Rajmil, L., Erhart,M., Bruil,J., Duer,… Kidscreen Group E (2005). Kidscreen-52 Quality of life measure for children and adolescents. Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research, 5(3), 353–365. CrossRef

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67. CrossRef

Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 1069–1081. CrossRef

Schonert-Reichl, K.A., Guhn, M., Gadermann, A. M., Hymel, S., Sweiss, L., & Hertzman, C. (2013). Development and validation of the Middle Years Development Instrument (MDI): Assessing children's well-being and assets across multiple contexts. Social Indicators Research, 114(2), 345–369. CrossRef

Seligman, M. E. P. (2011). Flourish. New York, NY, ZDA: Simon & Schuster.

Smolej Fritz, B., & Avsec, A. (2007). The experience of flow and subjective well-being of music students, Psihološka obzorja, 16(2), 5–17.

Stevanovic, D. (2009). Serbian KINDL questionnaire for quality of life assessments in healthy children and adolescents: Reproducibility and construct validity. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 7(1), 1–7. CrossRef

Strniša, J. (2007). Pomembnost in uresničenost vrednot v odnosu do subjektivnega blagostanja pri slovenskih in britanskih študentih. Psihološka obzorja, 16(2), 19–34.

The Children's Society (2017). The good childhood report 2017. Pridobljeno s https://www.childrenssociety.org.uk/what-we-do/resources-and-publications/the-good-childhood-report-2017

Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070. CrossRef


« Back to Volume 28 (2019)