Pojdi na slovensko stran članka / Go to the article page in Slovene
Comparability of achievement at basic and higher level of mathematics at general matura
Gašper Cankar & Janez Žerovnik
Full text (pdf) | Views: 108 | Written in Slovene. | Published: November 19, 2020
https://doi.org/10.20419/2020.29.523 | Cited By: CrossRef (0)
Abstract: Mathematics examination on general matura is widely established in Slovenia as it represents one of compulsory exams. Since 1995 every gymnasium student must take it either at basic or higher level of difficulty. On the basic level a student can achieve grade points 1-5 while at higher level grade points go from 1 to 8. Both National examinations centre and subject experts committee constantly implement different instruments to assure equivalent point grades for equivalent knowledge on both exams. There is, however, always a possibility for improvements in current procedures towards higher objectivity and fairness. We compared current methods for setting grade boundaries (based on Classical Test Theory) to results and insights gained from Item Response Theory. They suggest new post-hoc procedures that may be implemented in a critical time period when grade boundaries are being defined. New procedures may improve both fairness and equivalence of grade points that students achieve on basic and higher level of examinations in mathematics.
Keywords: general matura, mathematics, item response theory, level equivalence
Cite:
Cankar, G., & Žerovnik, J. (2020). Primerljivost dosežkov na osnovni in višji ravni izpita iz matematike na splošni maturi [Comparability of achievement at basic and higher level of mathematics at general matura]. Psihološka obzorja, 29, 158–169. https://doi.org/10.20419/2020.29.523
Reference list
Andrich, D. (1988). Rasch models for measurement. Sage. CrossRef
Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2015). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. Routledge. CrossRef
Banič, I., Erker, J., Fošnarič, M., Grahor, A., Levstek, T. Škrlec, M., & Žerovnik, J. (2019a). Matematika: predmetni izpitni katalog za splošno maturo. Državni izpitni center.
Banič, I., Erker, J., Fošnarič, M., Grahor, A., Levstek, T. Škrlec, M., & Žerovnik, J. (2019b). Novosti na splošni maturi 2021 pri predmetu matematika. Obzornik za matematiko in fiziko, 66(5), 161–171.
Bucik, V. (1997). Osnove psihološkega testiranja [Basics of psychological testing]. Ljubljana: Filozofska fakulteta Univerze v Ljubljani.
Crocker, L. M., & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
Doward, L. C. (2003). Development of the ASQoL: A quality of life instrument specific to ankylosing spondylitis. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 62(1), 20–26. CrossRef
Erker, J., Fošnarič, M., Grahor, A., Levstek, T. Škrlec, M., & Žerovnik, J. (2020). Primerljivost izpitov na osnovni in višji ravni pri predmetu matematika na splošni maturi. Obzornik za matematiko in fiziko, 67(1), 1–11.
Gilworth, G., Chamberlain, M. A., Harvey, A., Woodhouse, A., Smith, J., Smyth, M. G., & Tennant, A. (2003). Development of a work instability scale for rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis & Rheumatism, 49(3), 349–354. CrossRef
Hauptman, A. (2010). Equating of grades at basic and higher level of mathematics achievement. Metodološki zvezki, 7(2), 167–181.
Japelj Pavešić, B., & Cankar, G. (2018). Linking mathematics TIMSS achievement to national examination scores and school marks: Unexpected gender differences in Slovenia. Orbis scholae, 12(2), 77–100. CrossRef
Masters G.N., & Wright B.D. (1997). The partial credit model. V: W. J. van der Linden in R. K. Hambleton (ur.), Handbook of modern item response theory. Springer. CrossRef
McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test Theory: A unified treatment. LEA.
National Research Council (1982). Ability Testing: Uses, Consequences, and Controversies. National Academies Press.
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill.
Poljanšek, A. (2000). Ustreznost vrednotenja znanja pri maturitetnem izpitu iz matematike [Adequacy of knowledge evaluation on mathematics matura exam]. Psihološka obzorja, 9(1), 69–78.
Progar, Š., & Sočan, G. (2008). An empirical comparison of Item response theory and Classical Test theory. Psihološka obzorja, 17(3), 5–24.
R Core Team (2017). R: A language and environment for statistical computing [program]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org
Robitzsch, A., Kiefer, T., & Wu, M. (2018). TAM: Test analysis modules (R package version 2.10-24) [programski paket]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=TAM
Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 420–428. CrossRef
Sočan, G. (2000). Ocenjevanje zanesljivosti maturitetnih izpitov [Assesing reliability of matura exams]. Psihološka obzorja, 9(1), 79–90.
Žerovnik, J. (2015). About use and misuse of statistics in education: On mathematics exams at general matura in Slovenia. Education Practice and Innovation, 2(1), 1–7. CrossRef
