This site uses cookies for user authentication, optional permanent login and monitoring the number of page views (Google Analytics).
Do you agree with cookies being used in accordance with our Privacy policy? You can change your decision regarding the use of cookies on the Privacy page.

I want to know more

Horizons of Psychology :: Psihološka obzorja

Scientific and Professional Psychological Journal of the Slovenian Psychologists' Association

Indexed in:
Academic OneFile

Member of DOAJ and CrossRef



My Account

Most viewed articles


« Back to Volume 30 (2021)

flag Pojdi na slovensko stran članka / Go to the article page in Slovene

Evaluation of visual motor skills to determine effective behaviour in demanding work situations

Matej Čeh & Marija Molan

pdf Full text (pdf)  |  Views: 94  |  flagWritten in Slovene.  |  Published: July 2, 2021

pdf  |  Cited By: CrossRef (0)

Abstract: A person’s ability to behave effectively in demanding work situations at work is evaluated as part of a psychological assessment of work ability. Workplaces, where the visual and motor skill loads are assessed as above average, adequate psychomotor skills of the worker are required. In this paper we present the results of a research performed on a sample of 198 candidates and employees in workplaces from the fields of first response, health, safety, and security. We evaluated the psychomotor abilities of the individuals included in the research by using tests of visual orientation, visual motor coordination, and differentiated motor responsiveness. The results were compared according to the way stimuli were presented (active or adaptive), the type of motor activity (discrete or continuous), and the responses/stimuli ratio. Analysis shows that individuals with faster responses are more effective with discrete motor tasks. To perform continuous motor tasks under time pressure, the individual must have adequate balance of psychomotor functions, which is determined with the speed and accuracy ratio response. The analysis shows that there are statistically significant differences in the ability of participants to keep accurate responses under time pressure. These differences show the psychomotor response style that either favours speed or accuracy. We conclude that the speed and accuracy of motor reactions is not sufficient to provide a comprehensive assessment of the psychomotor capability. When evaluating the ability to perform adequately in work with higher risk conditions it is necessary to consider the ratio between speed and accuracy, as well as the capability of maintaining adequate motor reactions under time pressure.

Keywords: work ability assessment, demanding work situations, visual motor skills, response time, behavioral efficiency

Čeh, M., & Molan, M. (2021). Evalvacija zaznavno-motoričnih sposobnosti za ugotavljanje učinkovitega vedenja v varnostno zahtevnih situacijah [Evaluation of visual motor skills to determine effective behaviour in demanding work situations]. Psihološka obzorja, 30, 171–181.

Reference list

Cox, T., & Griffiths, A. (2005). The nature and measurement of work-related stress: Theory and practice, V J. R. Wilson in N. Corlett (ur.), Evaluation of human work (3rd. Ed.; str. 553–572). CRS Press. CrossRef

Drenovac, M. (1994). CRD - Serija psihodijagnostičkih testova [CRD Series of psychodiagnostic tests]. AKD.

EU-OSHA. (2009). Različnost delovne sile in ocena tveganja: Zagotoviti, da so vsi upoštevani Povzetek poročila agencije. [Workforce diversity and risk assessment: Ensure that everyone is considered: Report's summary] [podatkovni list]. Facts, 87.

Eurofound, & EU-OSHA (2014). Psychosocial risk in Europe: Prevalence and strategies for prevention. Publications Office of the European Union.

Goldhammer, F. (2015) Measuring ability, speed, or both? Challenges, psychometric solutions, and what can be gained from experimental control. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 13(3–4), 133–164. CrossRef

Green, B. F., Bock, R. D, Humphreys, L. B., Linn, R. L., & Reckase, M. D. (1984). Technical guideline for assessing computerized adaptive tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 21(4), 347–360. CrossRef

Guliksen, H. (1950). Wiley publications in psychology. Theory of mental tests . John Wiley and Sons. CrossRef

Hill, K., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2018). Psychomotor skills for the 21st century: What should students learn?. Center for Curriculum Redesign.

Hockey, G. R. J. (1997). Compensatory control in the regulation of human performance under stress and high workload: A cognitive-energetical framework. Biological Psychology, 45, 73–93. CrossRef

Karasek, R. A. (1979). Job demands, job decision latitude and mental strain: Implication for job redesign. Administrative Science Quartely, 24, 285–308. CrossRef

Karasek, R. A., & Theorell, T. (1990). Healthy work: Stress, productivity and the reconstruction of working life. Basic Books.

Kisser, R., Krafack, A., & Vaughan, C. (1986). Determinationsgeräte [Determination tool]. V R. Brickenkamp (ur.), Handbuch apparativer Verfahren in der Psychologie (str. 225–249). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

Leonard, J. A. (1959). Tactual choice reactions: I. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 11, 76–83. CrossRef

Lohman, D. F. (1989). Individual differences in errors and latencies on cognitive tasks. Learning and Individual Differences, 1(2), 179–202. CrossRef

Mankowska, M., Poliszczuk, T., Poliszczuk, D., & Johne, M. (2015). Visual perception and its effect on reaction time and time-movement anticipation in elite female basketball players. Polish Journal of Sport and Tourism, 22, 3–14. CrossRef

Molan, M., & Arnerič, N. (2000). Struktura in vsebina psihološkega pregleda za oceno delazmožnosti [The structure of psychological examination and assessment of ability for work]. Psihološka obzorja, 9(4), 115–126.

Molan, M., & Molan, G. (2008). Model ocenjevanja v delovnem okolju [Assessment model in the work environment]. Sanitas ellabor/Ocena tveganja, 7(1), 31–44.

Musek, J. (2005). Psihološke in kognitivne študije osebnosti [Psychological and cognitive personality studies]. Znanstveni inštitut Filozofske fakultete.

Neubauer, C. (1978). Selective reaction times and intelligence. Intelligence, 14(1), 79–96. CrossRef

Posner, M. I., & McLeod, P. (1982). Information processing models - In search of elementary operations. Annual Reviews of Psychology, 33, 477–514. CrossRef

Reckase, M. D. (1989). Adaptive testing: The evolution of a good idea. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 8(3), 11–15. CrossRef

Schmidt, R. A. (1988). Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis (2nd ed.). Human Kinetics Publishers.

Schuhfried, G. (2017). Vienna test system - Determination test (Version 44 - Revision 1). Schuhfried.

Sommer, M., Heidinger, C., Arendasy, M., Schauer, S., Schmitz-Gielsdorf, J., & Häusler, J. (2010). Cognitive and personality determinants of post-injury driving fitness. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 25(2), 99–117. CrossRef

Škof, B. (2019). Načrtovanje športne vadbe [Sports training planning]. Fakulteta za šport, Inštitut za šport.

Thurstone, L. L. (1937). Ability, motivation and speed. Psychometrika, 2(4), 249–254. CrossRef

Vernon. P. A. (1987). Speed of information-processing and intelligence. Ablex. CrossRef

Vetter, M., Schüneman, L., Debelak, R., Gatscha, M., Herle, M., Mandler, G., & Ortner, T. (2015). Predicting safe driving behaviour in professional drivers: A theory-based validation of cognitive and personality tests. Zeitschrift für Verkehrssicherheit ZVS, 61(4), 222–234.

Zabukovec, V., Žlender, B., Polič, M., Divjak, M., & Markl, M. (2007). Psihološki vidiki preventivnih dejavnosti v prometu [Psychological aspects of preventive activities in traffic]. Znanstvenoraziskovalni inštitut Filozofske fakultete.

Zakon o varnosti, & zdravju pri delu (ZVZD-1) [Occupational Safety and Health Act]. (2011). Uradni list RS, št. 43/2011.

« Back to Volume 30 (2021)