This site uses cookies for user authentication, optional permanent login and monitoring the number of page views (Google Analytics).
Do you agree with cookies being used in accordance with our Privacy policy? You can change your decision regarding the use of cookies on the Privacy page.

I want to know more

Horizons of Psychology :: Psihološka obzorja

Scientific and Professional Psychological Journal of the Slovenian Psychologists' Association

Indexed in:
Scopus
PsycINFO
Academic OneFile

Member of DOAJ and CrossRef

sien
CONTENTS FOR AUTHORS ABOUT EDITORIAL BOARD LINKS

Search

My Account

Most viewed articles

 

« Back to Volume 32 (2023)

flag Pojdi na slovensko stran članka / Go to the article page in Slovene


Is perception of facial attractiveness more influenced by previous information or comparison?

Lucija Lučka Debelak, Kaja Klančar, Tinkara Strel, Rebeka Šumrada, Lea Vaupotič & Anka Slana Ozimič

pdf Full text (pdf)  |  Views: 163  |  flagWritten in Slovene.  |  Published: June 15, 2023

pdf https://doi.org/10.20419/2023.32.575  |  Cited By: CrossRef (0)

Abstract: Perception of facial attractiveness is largely influenced by individual experiences and preferences, as well as various cognitive factors. Previous research has shown that when comparing multiple faces, choosing the most attractive face is influenced by prior information about how attractive the face appears to others and by the possibility to compare a face with a similar but obviously less attractive face. The aim of our study was to confirm previous findings on the influence of prior information and the possibility of comparison on the assessment of facial attractiveness, and to investigate which of the factors has a greater influence. 498 participants (146 males) aged between 12 and 51 years participated in an online study. Participants underwent three experimental conditions (prior information, comparison, and combined condition) in which their task was to select the most attractive face from photographs of comparatively attractive faces. Results showed that in the prior information condition, participants more often selected a face that others found more attractive compared to a face without such prior information. In the comparison condition, participants were more likely to select a face that could be compared to a similar but obviously less attractive face than a face for which this possibility did not exist. In the combined condition, participants more often chose a face for which prior information was provided than a face that could be compared to a similar but obviously less attractive face. The results confirm the findings of previous research on prior information and the possibility of comparison and suggest that prior information has a greater influence on the perception of facial attractiveness.

Keywords: attractiveness, prior information, comparison


Cite:
Debelak, L. C., Klančar, K., Stre, T., Šumrada, R., Vaupotič, L., & Slana Ozimič, A. (2023). Ali na zaznavanje privlačnosti obrazov bolj vplivajo predhodne informacije ali možnost primerjave? [Is perception of facial attractiveness more influenced by previous information or comparison?]. Psihološka obzorja, 32, 71–77. https://doi.org/10.20419/2023.32.575


Reference list


Acevedo, M., & Krueger, J. (2004). Two egocentric sources of the decision to vote: The voter's illusion and the belief in personal relevance. Political Psychology, 25(1), 115–134. CrossRef

Anderson, S. L. (2019). The importance of attractiveness across cultures. V K. D. Keith (ur.), Cross-cultural psychology: Contemporary themes and perspectives (str. 598–613). Wiley. CrossRef

Ariely, D. (2008). Predictably irrational. HarperCollins.

Asch, S. E. (1951). Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgment. V H. Guetzkow (ur.), Groups, leadership and men (str. 177–190). Carnegie.

Bruin, W. B., Parker, A. M., & Fischhoff, B. (2007). Individual differences in adult decision-making competence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(5), 938–956. CrossRef

Cho, I., Wesslen, R., Karduni, A., Santhanam, S., Shaikh, S., & Dou, W. (2017). The anchoring effect in decision-making with visual analytics. V B. Fischer, S. Liu in T. Schreck (ur.), 2017 IEEE Conference on visual analytics science and technology: Proceedings, Phoenix, Arizona, USA, 1-6 October 2017 (str. 116–126). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. CrossRef

Evans, J. S., Barston, J. L., & Pollard, P. (1983). On the conflict between logic and belief in syllogistic reasoning. Memory & Cognition, 11(3), 295–306. CrossRef

Furnham, A., & Boo, H. C. (2011). A literature review of anchoring bias. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 40(1), 35–42. CrossRef

Juliusson, E. A., Karlsson, N., & Gärling, T. (2005). Weighing the past and the future in decision making. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology and Aging, 23(1), 33–38. CrossRef

R Core Team. (2014). The R project for statistical computing [računalniški program]. http://www.R- project.org/

Sakamoto, Y., Ma, J., & Nickerson, J. V. (2009). 2377 people like this article: The influence of others' decisions on yours. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 31(31), 1959–1964.

Sherif, M. (1935). A study of some social factors in perception. Archives of Psychology, 27, 1–60.

Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2008). On the relative independence of thinking biases and cognitive ability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(4), 672–695. CrossRef

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1130. CrossRef

Ule, M. (1997). Temelji socialne psihologije. Znanstveno in publicistično središče.

Zager Kocjan, G., Lavtar, D., & Sočan, G. (2022). The effects of survey mode on self-reported psychological functioning: Measurement invariance and latent mean comparison across face-to-face and web modes. Behavior Research Methods, 1–18. CrossRef

West, R. F., Toplak, M. E., & Stanovich, K. E. (2008). Heuristics and biases as measures of critical thinking: Associations with cognitive ability and thinking dispositions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(4), 930–941. CrossRef

Wickham, H. (2009). ggplot2 [računalniški program]. Springer. CrossRef


« Back to Volume 32 (2023)