Pojdi na slovensko stran članka / Go to the article page in Slovene
The changing duties of organizational psychologists in Slovenia in the past and in the present
Eva Boštjančič & Aina Laimiš
Full text (pdf) | Views: 270 | Written in Slovene. | Published: May 29, 2016
https://doi.org/10.20419/2016.25.443 | Cited By: CrossRef (0)
Abstract: As with other areas, the growth of occupational and organizational psychology is based on scientific research, variety of situational factors and trends, and needs that arise in the organizational environment. The aim of the study was to describe the tasks carried out by psychologists in organizations in the past (55 years long history of the field in Slovenia), and to compare these with the tasks that are currently performed. The results were compared with similar studies that had been conducted in Slovenia. The results reveal that the work carried out by psychologists in organizations is currently more diverse, but also more focused on specific forms of work, particularly those related to psychological assessment, counseling, and motivation. Their duties are now more likely to be conducted in an international environment and involve working directly with employees and leaders. Participants also gave recommendations to psychologists who work or want to work in the field of organizational psychology.
Keywords: occupational psychology, human resources psychology, organizational psychology, work tasks, psychologists
Cite:
Boštjančič, E., & Laimiš, A. (2016). Spreminjanje delovnih nalog slovenskih organizacijskih psihologov skozi čas [The changing duties of organizational psychologists in Slovenia in the past and in the present]. Psihološka obzorja, 25, 38–47. https://doi.org/10.20419/2016.25.443
Reference list
Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2013). What corporate environmental sustainability can do for industrial-organizational psychology. V A. H. Huffman in S. R. Klein (ur.), Green organizations: Driving change with IO psychology (str. 379–392). New York: Routledge.
Aguinis, H., Joo, H., & Gottfredson, R. K. (2013). What monetary rewards can and cannot do: How to show employees the money. Business Horizons, 56(2), 241–249. CrossRef
Briner, R. B., & Rousseau, D. M. (2011). Evidence-based I-O psychology: Not there yet. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 4, 3–22. CrossRef
Cable, A. J., & O'Driscoll, M. P. (2010). The practice of industrial/organisational psychology in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 39(3), 12–18.
Cascio, W. F. (1995). Whither industrial and organizational psychology in changing world of work. American Psychologist, 50(11), 928–939. CrossRef
Cascio, W. F. (2008). To prosper, organizational psychology should... bridge application and scholarship. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29, 455–468. CrossRef
Cascio, W. F., & Aguinis, H. (2008). Research in industrial and organizational psychology from 1963 to 2007: Changes, choices, and trends. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(5), 1062–1081. CrossRef
García-Izquierdo, A. L., Aguinis, H., & Ramos-Villagrasa, P. J. (2010). Science–practice gap in e-recruitment. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 18(4), 432–438. CrossRef
Konrad, E. (1984). Nekaj indikatorjev relevantnosti znanja za opravljanje nalog psihologa v delovnih organizacijah [Some indicators of the relevance of knowledge for performing tasks of a psychologist in work organizations]. V J. Gregorač (ur.), Posvetovanje psihologov Slovenije, Portorož, november 1983 [Slovenian psychology conference, Portorož, November 1983] (str. 207–214). Ljubljana, Slovenija: Društvo psihologov RS Slovenije.
Konrad, E. (1997). Research in work and organizational psychology in Slovenia. Risorsa uomo, 5(4), 405–418.
Landy, F. J., & Conte J. M. (2007). Work in the 21st century: An introduction to industrial and organizational psychology. Oxford, Združeno kraljestvo: Blackwell.
Piotrowski, C. (2012). Occupational health psychology: Neglected areas of research. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 39(3), 189–191.
Rak, K. (2002). Problematika dela psihologov dela [Work related issues of work psychologists] (neobjavljeno diplomsko delo). Filozofska fakulteta Univerze v Ljubljani, Slovenija.
Rogelberg, S. G. (2002). Handbook of research methods in industrial and organizational psychology. Cambridge, MA, ZDA: Blackwell.
Sabadin, A. (2004). Psihologija dela v Sloveniji pred in po tranziciji [Work psychology in Slovenia before and after transition]. Panika, 9(1), 20–23.
Sabadin, A., & Konrad, E. (1998). Psihologija dela v Sloveniji 1996 [Work psychology in Slovenia 1996]. Referat, predstavljen na 2. kongresu psihologov Slovenije, Portorož, Slovenija, 1998 [Paper presented at 2nd Conference of Slovenian Psychologists, Portorož, Slovenia, 1998].
Silzer, R., & Cober, R. (2011). Shaping the future of industrial-organizational psychology practice. The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 49(1), 81–88.
Stirling, A. J. (2001). Thematic networks: An analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 1(3), 385–405. CrossRef
Zelin, A. I., Oliver, J., Chau, S., Bynum, B., Carter, G., & Poteet, M. L. (2015). Identifying the competencies, critical experiences, and career paths of O-I psychologists: Industry. The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 53(1), 142–151.
Zorc, M. (2013). Gospodarska kriza v Sloveniji in ukrepi za izhod iz nje [Economic crisis in Slovenia and measures to find a way out of it]. V Z znanjem do idej za nov zagon gospodarstva: Zbornik 10. festivala raziskovanja ekonomije in managementa [From knowledge to ideas to boost the economy: Proceedings of 10th festival of research in economy and management] (str. 125–134). Koper, Slovenija: Fakulteta za management.
