Spletna stran Psiholoških obzorij uporablja piškotke za namene avtentikacije uporabnikov po prijavi na spletno stran, morebitno stalno prijavo na željo uporabnika in za namen beleženja števila ogledov posameznih strani Psiholoških obzorij.
Ali se strinjate, da na vaš računalnik (brskalnik) naložimo piškotke za te namene? Svojo odločitev lahko kasneje tudi spremenite na strani Zasebnost.

Želim izvedeti več

Psihološka obzorja :: Horizons of Psychology

Znanstveno-strokovna psihološka revija Društva psihologov Slovenije

Indeksirana v:
Scopus
PsycINFO
Academic OneFile

Smo člani DOAJ in CrossRef

sien
VSEBINA ZA AVTORJE PREDSTAVITEV UREDNIŠTVO POVEZAVE

Iskalnik

Moj račun

Članki z največ ogledi

 

« Nazaj na Letnik 21 (2012), Številka 1

flag Go to the article page in English / Pojdi na angleško stran članka


Povezanost teorije uma s socialnimi odnosi in otrokovo socialno kompetentnostjo

Nuša Skubic

pdf Polno besedilo (pdf)  |  Ogledi: 149  |  flagNapisan v slovenščini.  |  Objavljeno: 28. oktober 2012

pdf https://doi.org/10.20419/2012.21.358  |  Citati: CrossRef (0)

Povzetek: Prispevek predstavlja pregled in evalvacijo ugotovitev raziskovalcev s področja teorije uma v povezavi s socialnimi odnosi in na drugi strani v povezavi z otrokovo socialno kompetentnostjo, ki je odraz njegove teorije uma. Prikazuje, kateri so tisti dejavniki, ki največ prispevajo k individualnim razlikam v razvitosti teorije uma med otroki in poudarja dvosmernost učinkov med otrokovim socialnim razumevanjem in socialnimi odnosi z drugimi. Pozitivni dejavniki za razvoj otrokove teorije uma so v prvi vrsti otrokove zgodnje kakovostne izkušnje o mentalnih stanjih, ki dobro napovedujejo njegov poznejši dosežek pri preizkusu razumevanja napačnih prepričanj. Od družinskih dejavnikov so za razvoj otrokove teorije uma pomembni predvsem socialno-ekonomski položaj družine, vedenje in govor staršev (npr. ustrezna raba izrazov za opisovanje mentalnih stanj in ustrezni načini discipliniranja otroka) in prisotnost ustrezno starega (ponavadi starejšega) sorojenca, s katerim ima otrok kakovosten odnos, medtem ko raziskovalci izmed dejavnikov, ki niso vezani na družinsko okolje, najbolj poudarjajo pomen vrstnikov za otrokovo teorijo uma. Skladno s temi dejavniki se pri otroku bolj ali manj uspešno razvija njegovo socialno razumevanje, ki igra pomembno vlogo v njegovem vsakdanjem življenju. Tako otroci z dobro razvito teorijo uma to lahko uporabljajo na prosocialen način, lahko pa ta služi tudi proaktivni oziroma posredni obliki agresivnosti, ko otroci svoje razumevanje drugih uporabljajo za različne oblike manipulacij oz. nasilništva, posebej v vrstniški skupini. Nizko razvita teorija uma je dejavnik tveganja predvsem v primeru neugodnih družinskih razmer, medtem ko ima dobro razvita teorija uma v takih razmerah za otrokov razvoj lahko zaščitno vlogo. Prispevek opozarja na nekatere metodološke in strukturne pomanjkljivosti pregledanih študij ter predlaga usmeritve za možnosti celovitejšega raziskovanja otrokove teorije uma v prihodnje.

Ključne besede: teorija uma, socialni odnosi, socialna kompetentnost, socialno vedenje, Vygotsky, agresivnost


Citiraj:
Skubic, N. (2012). Povezanost teorije uma s socialnimi odnosi in otrokovo socialno kompetentnostjo [Association of theory of mind with social relations and child's social competence]. Psihološka obzorja, 21(1), 51–66. https://doi.org/10.20419/2012.21.358


Seznam literature v članku


Badenes, L. V., Estevan, R. A. C. in Bacete, F. J. (2000). Theory of mind and peer rejection at school. Social Development, 9(3), 271–283. CrossRef

Brown, J. R., Donelan-McCall, N. in Dunn, J. (1996). Why talk about mental states? The significance of children's conversations with friends, siblings, and mothers. Child Development, 67(3), 836–849. CrossRef

Caravita, S. C., Di Blasio, P. in Salmivalli, C. (2010). Early adolescents' participation in bullying: Is ToM involved? The Journal of Early Adolescence, 30(1), 138–170. CrossRef

Carpendale, J. in Lewis, C. (2006a). Social interaction and the development of social understanding: The role of relationships in social cognitive development. V J. Carpendale in C. Lewis (ur.), How children develop social understanding (str. 133–157). Oxford: Blackwell publishing. >

Carpendale, J. in Lewis, C. (2006b). Social understanding and children's social lives. V J. Carpendale in C. Lewis (ur.), How children develop social understanding (str. 205–230). Oxford: Blackwell publishing. >

Carpendale, J. I. in Lewis, C. (2004). Constructing an understanding of mind: The development of children's social understanding within social interaction. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27(1), 79–151. CrossRef

Cassidy, K. W., Fineberg, D. S., Brown, K. in Perkins, A. (2005). Theory of mind may be contagious, but you don't catch it from your twin. Child Development, 76(1), 97–106. CrossRef

Cassidy, K. W., Werner, R. S., Rourke, M., Zubernis, L. S. in Balaraman, G. (2003). The relationship between psychological understanding and positive social behaviors. Social Development, 12(2), 198–221. CrossRef

Crick, N. R. in Dodge, K. A. (1996). Social information-processing mechanisms on reactive and proactive aggression. Child Development, 67(3), 993–1002. CrossRef

Cutting, A. L. in Dunn, J. (1999). Theory of mind, emotion understanding, language, and family background: Individual differences and interrelations. Child Development, 70(4), 853–865. CrossRef

de Rosnay, M. in Hughes, C. (2006). Conversation and theory of mind: Do children talk their way to socio-cognitive understanding? British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 24(1), 7–37. CrossRef

Fahie, C. M. in Symons, D. K. (2003). Executive functioning and theory of mind in children clinically referred for attention and behavior problems. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 24(1), 51–73. CrossRef

Fernyhough, C. (2008). Getting Vygotskian about theory of mind: Mediation, dialogue, and the development of social understanding. Developmental Review, 28(2), 225–262. CrossRef

Foote, R. C. in Holmes-Lonergan, H. A. (2003). Sibling conflict and theory of mind. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 21(1), 45–58. CrossRef

Howe, N., Rinaldi, C. M., Jennings, M. in Petrakos, H. (2002). "No! The lambs can stay out because they got cozies!": Constructive and destructive sibling conflict, pretend play, and social understanding. Child Development, 73(5), 1460–1473. CrossRef

Hughes, C. in Cutting, A. L. (1999). Nature, nurture, and individual differences in early understanding of mind. Psychological Science, 10(5), 429–432. CrossRef

Hughes, C., Deater-Deckard, K. in Cutting, A. L. (1999). "Speak roughly to your little boy?" Sex differences in the relations between parenting and preschoolers' understanding of mind. Social Development, 8(2), 143–160. CrossRef

Hughes, C. in Ensor, R. (2005). Executive function and theory of mind in 2 year olds: A family affair? Developmental Neuropsychology, 28(2), 645–668. CrossRef

Hughes, C. in Ensor, R. (2006). Behavioural problems in 2-year-olds: Links with individual differences in theory of mind, executive function and harsh parenting. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 47(5), 488–497. CrossRef

Hughes, C. in Ensor, R. (2007). Positive and protective: Effects of early theory of mind on problem behaviors in at-risk preschoolers. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 48(10), 1025–1032. CrossRef

Hughes, C., Fujisawa, K. K., Ensor, R., Lecce, S. in Marfleet, R. (2006). Cooperation and conversations about the mind: A study of individual differences in 2-year-olds and their siblings. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 24(1), 53–72. CrossRef

Hughes, C., Jaffee, S. R., Happe, F., Taylor, A., Caspi, A. in Moffitt, T. E. (2005). Origins of individual differences in theory of mind: From nature to nurture? Child Development, 76(2), 356–370. CrossRef

Jenkins, J. M. in Astington, J. W. (1996). Cognitive factors and family structure associated with theory of mind development in young children. Developmental Psychology, 32(1), 70–78. CrossRef

Kavčič, T. in Zupančič, M. (2006). Parental differential treatment of siblings in childhood. Psihološka Obzorja/Horizons of Psychology, 15(4), 5–24.

Lane, J. D., Wellman, H. M., Olson, S. L., LaBounty, J. in Kerr, D. C. (2010). Theory of mind and emotion understanding predict moral development in early childhood. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 28(4), 871–889. CrossRef

Lewis, C., Freeman, N. H., Kyriakidou, C., Maridaki-Kassotaki, K. in Berridge, D. M. (1996). Social influences on false belief access: Specific sibling influences or general apprenticeship? Child Development, 67(6), 2930–2947. CrossRef

Marjanovič Umek, L. (2009). Spoznavni razvoj v zgodnjem otroštvu [Cognitive development in early choldhood]. V L. Marjanovič Umek in M. Zupančič (ur.), Razvojna psihologija [Developmental psychology] (str. 291–314). Ljubljana: Znanstvena založba Filozofske fakultete.

Marjanovič Umek, L., Zupančič, M., Fekonja, U., Lešnik Musek, P. in Kavčič, T. (2001). Socialni razvoj v zgodnjem otroštvu in teorija uma [Social development in early childhood and theory of mind]. V L. Marjanovič Umek in M. Zupančič (ur.), Razvojna psihologija: izbrane teme [Developmental psychology: Selected works] (str. 42–59). Ljubljana: Oddelek za psihologijo Filozofske fakultete.

McAlister, A. in Peterson, C. (2007). A longitudinal study of child siblings and theory of mind development. Cognitive Development, 22(2), 258–270. CrossRef

McAlister, A. in Peterson, C. C. (2006). Mental playmates: Siblings, executive functioning and theory of mind. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 24(4), 733–751. CrossRef

McElwain, N. L. in Volling, B. L. (2004). Attachment security and parental sensitivity during infancy: Associations with friendship quality and false-belief understanding at age 4. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21(5), 639–667. CrossRef

Meins, E., Fernyhough, C., Russell, J. in Clark-Carter, D. (1998). Security of attachment as a predictor of symbolic and mentalising abilities: A longitudinal study. Social Development, 7(1), 1–24. CrossRef

Meins, E., Fernyhough, C., Wainwright, R., Gupta, M. D., Fradley, E. in Tuckey, M. (2002). Maternal mind-mindedness and attachment security as predictors of theory of mind understanding. Child Development, 73(6), 1715–1726. CrossRef

Ontai, L. L. in Thompson, R. A. (2008). Attachment, parent-child discourse and theory-of-mind development. Social Development, 17(1), 47–60. CrossRef

Pears, K. C. in Moses, L. J. (2003). Demographics, parenting, and theory of mind in preschool children. Social Development, 12(1), 1–19. CrossRef

Perner, J., Ruffman, T. in Leekam, S. R. (1994). Theory of mind is contagious: You catch it from your sibs. Child Development, 65(4), 1228–1238. CrossRef

Peterson, C. C. (2000). Influence of siblings' perspectives on theory of mind. Cognitive Development, 15(4), 435–455. CrossRef

Peterson, C. C., Garnett, M., Kelly, A. in Attwood, T. (2009). Everyday social and conversation applications of theory-of-mind understanding by children with autism-spectrum disorders or typical development. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 18(2), 105–115. CrossRef

Peterson, C. C. in Siegal, M. (2002). Mindreading and moral awareness in popular and rejected preschoolers. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 20(2), 205–224. CrossRef

Racine, T. P., Carpendale, J. I. in Turnbull, W. (2006). Cross-sectional and longitudinal relations between mother-child talk about conflict and children's social understanding. British Journal of Psychology, 97(4), 521–536. CrossRef

Randell, A. C. in Peterson, C. C. (2009). Affective qualities of sibling disputes, mothers' conflict attitudes, and children's theory of mind development. Social Development, 18(4), 857–874. CrossRef

Razza, R. A. in Blair, C. (2009). Associations among false-belief understanding, executive function, and social competence: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30(3), 332–343. CrossRef

Recchia, H. E. in Howe, N. (2009). Associations between social understanding, sibling relationship quality, and siblings' conflict strategies and outcomes. Child Development, 80(5), 1564–1578. CrossRef

Renouf, A., Brendgen, M., Parent, S., Vitaro, F., Zelazo, P. D., Boivin, M., Dionne, G., Tremblay, R. E., Perusse, D. in Seguin, J. R. (2010a). Relations between theory of mind and indirect and physical aggression in kindergarten: Evidence of the moderating role of prosocial behaviors. Social Development, 19(3), 535–555. CrossRef

Renouf, A., Brendgen, M., Seguin, J. R., Vitaro, F., Boivin, M., Dionne, G., Tremblay, R. E. in Perusse, D. (2010b). Interactive links between theory of mind, peer victimization, and reactive and proactive aggression. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology: An official publication of the International Society for Research in Child and Adolescent Psychopathology, 38(8), 1109–1123. CrossRef

Ronald, A., Happe, F., Hughes, C. in Plomin, R. (2005). Nice and nasty theory of mind in preschool children: Nature and nurture. Social Development, 14(4), 664–684. CrossRef

Ronald, A., Viding, E., Happe, F. in Plomin, R. (2006). Individual differences in theory of mind ability in middle childhood and links with verbal ability and autistic traits: A twin study. Social Neuroscience, 1(3–4) , 412–425. CrossRef

Ruffman, T., Perner, J., Naito, M., Parkin, L. in Clements, W. A. (1998). Older (but not younger) siblings facilitate false belief understanding. Developmental Psychology, 34(1), 161–174. CrossRef

Ruffman, T., Perner, J. in Parkin, L. (1999). How parenting style affects false belief understanding. Social Development, 8(3), 395–411. CrossRef

Ruffman, T., Slade, L., Devitt, K. in Crowe, E. (2006). What mothers say and what they do: The relation between parenting, theory of mind, language and conflict/cooperation. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 24(1), 105–124. CrossRef

Runions, K. C. in Keating, D. P. (2007). Young children's social information processing: Family antecedents and behavioral correlates. Developmental Psychology, 43(4), 838–849. CrossRef

Sabbagh, M. A. in Callanan, M. A. (1998). Metarepresentation in action: 3-, 4-, and 5-year-olds' developing theories of mind in parent-child conversations. Developmental Psychology, 34(3), 491–502. CrossRef

Slaughter, V., Dennis, M. J. in Pritchard, M. (2002). Theory of mind and peer acceptance in preschool children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 20(4), 545–564. CrossRef

Slaughter, V., Peterson, C. C. in Mackintosh, E. (2007). Mind what mother says: Narrative input and theory of mind in typical children and those on the autism spectrum. Child Development, 78(3), 839–858. CrossRef

Sutton, J., Smith, P. K. in Swettenham, J. (1999). Bullying and "theory of mind': A critique of the "social skills deficit' view of anti-social behaviour. Social Development, 8(1), 117–127. CrossRef

Symons, D. K. in Clark, S. E. (2000). A longitudinal study of mother-child relationships and theory of mind in the preschool period. Social Development, 9(1), 3–23. CrossRef

Symons, D. K., Fossum, K.-L. M. in Collins, T. (2006). A longitudinal study of belief and desire state discourse during mother-child play and later false belief understanding. Social Development, 15(4), 676–691. CrossRef

Symons, D. K., Peterson, C. C., Slaughter, V., Roche, J. in Doyle, E. (2005). Theory of mind and mental state discourse during book reading and story-telling tasks. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 23(1), 81–102. CrossRef

Vygotsky, L. S. (2010). Mišljenje in govor [Thought and Language] . Ljubljana: Pedagoška fakulteta.

Walker, S. (2005). Gender differences in the relationship between young children's peer-related social competence and individual differences in theory of mind. The Journal of Genetic Psychology: Research and Theory on Human Development, 166(3), 297–312. CrossRef

Wang, Y. in Su, Y. (2009). False belief understanding: Children catch it from classmates of different ages. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 33(4), 331–336. CrossRef

Watson, A. C., Nixon, C. L., Wilson, A. in Capage, L. (1999). Social interaction skills and theory of mind in young children. Developmental Psychology, 35(2), 386–391. CrossRef

Wellman, H. M., Cross, D. in Watson, J. (2001). Meta-analysis of theory-of-mind development: The truth about false belief. Child Development, 72(3), 655–684. CrossRef

Woolfe, T., Want, S. C. in Siegal, M. (2002). Signposts to development: Theory of mind in deaf children. Child Development, 73(3), 768–778. CrossRef

Yagmurlu, B., Berument, S. K. in Celimli, S. (2005). The role of institution and home contexts in theory of mind development. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 26(5), 521–537. CrossRef


« Nazaj na Letnik 21 (2012), Številka 1