Spletna stran Psiholoških obzorij uporablja piškotke za namene avtentikacije uporabnikov po prijavi na spletno stran, morebitno stalno prijavo na željo uporabnika in za namen beleženja števila ogledov posameznih strani Psiholoških obzorij.
Ali se strinjate, da na vaš računalnik (brskalnik) naložimo piškotke za te namene? Svojo odločitev lahko kasneje tudi spremenite na strani Zasebnost.

Želim izvedeti več

Psihološka obzorja :: Horizons of Psychology

Znanstveno-strokovna psihološka revija Društva psihologov Slovenije

Indeksirana v:
Scopus
PsycINFO
Academic OneFile

Smo člani DOAJ in CrossRef

sien
VSEBINA ZA AVTORJE PREDSTAVITEV UREDNIŠTVO POVEZAVE

Iskalnik

Moj račun

Članki z največ ogledi

 

« Nazaj na Letnik 24 (2015)

flag Go to the article page in English / Pojdi na angleško stran članka


Šestdeset let spraševanja "Kdo sem jaz?": Analiza vprašalnika Twenty Statements Test (TST)

Bojan Musil in Andrej Preglej

pdf Polno besedilo (pdf)  |  Ogledi: 333  |  flagNapisan v slovenščini.  |  Objavljeno: 16. oktober 2015

pdf https://doi.org/10.20419/2015.24.429  |  Citati: CrossRef (0)

Povzetek: Leta 1954 sta Kuhn in McPartland v kontekst raziskovanja posameznikovega pojmovanja sebe oziroma sebstva postavila enostavno vprašanje "Kdo sem jaz?". V kasnejših letih je ta preizkus postal popularen na področju psihološkega in sociološkega raziskovanja, v zadnjem času pa je aktualen na področju medkulturnih (psiholoških) študij. Po 60 letih smo si omenjeno vprašanje zastavili znova, in sicer v kontekstu analitičnega pregleda preteklih raziskav omenjenega instrumenta, s čimer poskušamo v celoviti evalvaciji odgovoriti tudi na vprašanje, ali je uporaba omenjenega vprašanja v raziskovalne namene dandanes še smiselna.

Ključne besede: Kdo sem jaz?, Preizkus dvajsetih izjav, pojmovanje sebe, sebstvo, analiza vprašalnika


Citiraj:
Musil, B. in Preglej, A. (2015). Šestdeset let spraševanja "Kdo sem jaz?": Analiza vprašalnika Twenty Statements Test (TST) [Sixty years of asking "Who am I?": Analysis of the Twenty Statements Test (TST)]. Psihološka obzorja, 24, 66–73. https://doi.org/10.20419/2015.24.429


Seznam literature v članku


Bond, M. H. in Cheung, T. S. (1983). College students' spontaneous self-concept: The effect of culture among respondents in Hong Kong, Japan, and the United States. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 14, 153–171. CrossRef

Bresnahan, M. J., Levine, T. R., Shearman, S. M., Lee, S. Y., Park, C. in Kiyomiya T. (2005). A multimethod multitrait validity assessment of self-construal in Japan, Korea, and the United States. Human Communication Research, 31(1), 33–59. CrossRef

Brewer, M. B. in Gardner, W. (1996). Who is this "We"? Levels of collective identity and self representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 83–93. CrossRef

Bucik, V. (1997). Osnove psihološkega testiranja. Ljubljana: Filozofska fakulteta, Oddelek za psihologijo.

Church, A. T. (2009). Prospects for an integrated trait and cultural psychology. European Journal of Personality, 23, 153–182. CrossRef

Cousins, S. D. (1989). Culture and self-perception in Japan and the United States. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 124–131. CrossRef

Cross, S. E., Hardin, E. E. in Gercek-Swing, B. (2011). The what, how, why, and where of self-construal. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15(2), 142–179. CrossRef

del Prado, A. M., Church, A. T., Katigbak, M. S., Miramontes, L. G., Whitty, M. T., Curtis, G. J. … Reyes, J. A. S. (2007). Culture, method, and the content of self-concepts: Testing trait, individual–self-primacy, and cultural psychology perspectives. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 1119–1160. CrossRef

Dhawan, N., Roseman, I. J., Naidu, R. K., Thapa, K. in Rettek, S. I. (1995). Self-concepts across two cultures: India and the United States. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 26, 606–621. CrossRef

Driver, E. D. (1969). Self-conceptions in India and the United States: A cross-cultural validation of the Twenty Statement Test. The Sociological Quarterly, 10 (3), 341–354. CrossRef

Foels, R. in Tomcho, T. J. (2009). Gender differences in interdependent self-construals: It's Not the type of group, it's the way you see it. Self and Identity, 8, 396–417. CrossRef

Gardner, W. L., Gabriel, S. in Lee, A. Y. (1999). "I" value freedom, but "We" value relationships: Self-construal priming mirrors cultural differences in judgment. Psychological Science, 10(4), 321–326. CrossRef

Grace, S. L. in Cramer, K. L. (2003). The elusive nature of self-measurement: The self-construal scale versus the twenty statements test. The Journal of social Psychology, 143(5), 649–668. CrossRef

Isbell, L. M., McCabe, J., Burns, K. C. in Lair, E. C. (2013). Who am I? The influence of affect on the working self-concept. Cognition and Emotion, 27(6), 1073–1090. CrossRef

Kanagawa, C., Cross, S. E. in Markus, H. R. (2001). "Who Am I?" The cultural psychology of the conceptual self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 90–103. CrossRef

Kuhn, M. H. (1960). Self-attitudes by age, sex, and professional training. The Sociological Quarterly, 1(1), 39–56. CrossRef

Kuhn, M. H. in McPartland, T. S. (1954). An empirical investigation of self-attitudes. American Sociological Review, 19(1), 68–76. CrossRef

Lam, M., Chan, G., Marcet, M. M., Wong, W., Wong, J, in Wong, D. (2014). Spontaneous self-concept among Chinese undergraduates in Hong Kong. Social Behavior and Personality, 42(8), 1353–1364. CrossRef

Ma, V. in Schoeneman, T. J. (1997). Individualism versus collectivism: A comparison of Kenyan and American self-concepts. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 19(2), 261–273. CrossRef

Madson, L. in Trafimov, D. (2001). Gender comparisons in the private, collective, and allocentric selves. The Journal of Social Psychology, 141(4), 551–559. CrossRef

Markus, H. R. in Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224–253. CrossRef

McPahil, C. in Tucker, C. W. (1972). The classification and ordering of responses to the question "Who Am I?". The Sociological Quarterly, 13(3), 329–347. CrossRef

McPartland, T. S., Cumming, J. H. in Garretson, W. S. (1961). Self-conception and ward behaviour in two psychiatric hospital. Sociometry, 24(2), 111–124. CrossRef

Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. London: The University of Chicago Press.

Montemayor, R. in Eisen, M. (1977). The development of self-conceptions from childhood to adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 13(4), 314–319. CrossRef

Rhee, E., Uleman, J. S., Lee, H. K. in Roman, R. J. (1995). Spontaneous self-descriptions and ethnic identities in individualistic and collectivistic cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(1), 142–152. CrossRef

Santamaria, A., de la Mata, M., Hansen, T. G. B. in Ruiz, L. (2010). Cultural self-construals of Mexican, Spanish, and Danish college students: Beyond independent and interdependent self. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 41(3), 471–477. CrossRef

Spitzer, S. P. (1969). Test equivalence of unstructured self-evaluation instruments. The Sociological Quarterly, 10(2), 204–215. CrossRef

Spitzer, S. P. in Parker, J. (1976). Perceived validity and assessment of the self: A decade later. The Sociological Quarterly, 17(2), 236–246. CrossRef

Spitzer, S. P., Stratton, J. R., Fitzgerald, J. D. in Mach, B. K. (1966). The self concept: Test equivalence and perceived validity. The Sociological Quarterly, 7(3), 265–280. CrossRef

Steck, L. W., Heckert, D. M. in Heckert, D. A. (2003). The salience of racial identity among African-American and white students. Race and Society, 6, 57–73. CrossRef

Stimson, J. in Stimson, A. (1978). Using the "Who am I?" Test to teach the logic of four-fold tables. Teaching Sociology, 5(3), 281–286. CrossRef

Triandis, H. C., McCusker, C. in Hui, C. H. (1990). Multimethod probes of individualism and collectivism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(5), 1006–1020. CrossRef

Tucker, C. W. (1966). Some methodological problems of Kuhn's self theory. The Sociological Quarterly, 7(3), 345–358. CrossRef

Vernon, G. M. (1962). Measuring religion: Two methods compared. Review of Religious Research, 3(4), 159–165. CrossRef

Watkins, D., Cheng, C., Mpofu, E., Olowu, S., Singh-Sengupta, S. in Regmi, M. (2003). Gender differences in self-construal: How generalizable are Western findings. The Journal of Social Psychology, 143(4), 501–519. CrossRef

Watkins, D. in Gerong, A. (1997). Culture and spontaneous self-concept among Filipino college students. The Journal of Social Psychology, 137(4), 480–488. CrossRef

Watkins, D. in Gerong, A. (1999). Language of response and the spontaneous self-concept: A test of the cultural accommodation hypothesis. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 30(1), 115–121. CrossRef

Wylie, R. C. (1974). The self concept: A review of methodological considerations and measuring instruments. Nebraska, ZDA: University of Nebraska press.


« Nazaj na Letnik 24 (2015)