Spletna stran Psiholoških obzorij uporablja piškotke za namene avtentikacije uporabnikov po prijavi na spletno stran, morebitno stalno prijavo na željo uporabnika in za namen beleženja števila ogledov posameznih strani Psiholoških obzorij.
Ali se strinjate, da na vaš računalnik (brskalnik) naložimo piškotke za te namene? Svojo odločitev lahko kasneje tudi spremenite na strani Zasebnost.

Želim izvedeti več

Psihološka obzorja :: Horizons of Psychology

Znanstveno-strokovna psihološka revija Društva psihologov Slovenije

Indeksirana v:
Scopus
PsycINFO
Academic OneFile

Smo člani DOAJ in CrossRef

sien
VSEBINA ZA AVTORJE PREDSTAVITEV UREDNIŠTVO POVEZAVE

Iskalnik

Moj račun

Članki z največ ogledi

 

« Nazaj na Letnik 25 (2016)

flag Go to the article page in English / Pojdi na angleško stran članka


Povezave med teorijo uma in metajezikovnimi zmožnostmi pri otrocih v zgodnjem otroštvu

Kaja Hacin

pdf Polno besedilo (pdf)  |  Ogledi: 253  |  flagNapisan v angleščini.  |  Objavljeno: 8. september 2016

pdf https://doi.org/10.20419/2016.25.448  |  Citati: CrossRef (1)

Povzetek: Namen pričujoče raziskave je bil podrobneje preučiti povezave med teorijo uma in metajezikovnimi zmožnostmi pri otrocih v zgodnjem otroštvu. V raziskavo je bilo vključenih 45 otrok, starih od 4;6 do 6 let, ki so prihajali iz 5 različnih slovenskih vrtcev. Za ocenjevanje teorije uma smo uporabili Nalogo napačnih prepričanj in Preizkus razvrščanja slik, za ocenjevanje metajezikovnih zmožnosti pa Lestvice splošnega govornega razvoja in Preizkus pripovedovanja zgodbe – Rokavička. Poleg tega je bil uporabljen tudi vprašalnik za starše, namenjen zbiranju informacij o igri otrok. Rezultati so pokazali pomembno povezanost med dosežki otrok pri večini uporabljenih preizkusov. Kot pomembna se je kazala medsebojna povezanost otrokove teorije uma z metajezikovnim zavedanjem in pripovedovanjem zgodbe, še posebej z vidika vsebinske strukture zgodbe. Povezave med navedenimi zmožnostmi lahko kažejo na podobne zahteve po otrokovem razumevanju reprezentacij, ki ga predvidevajo otrokova teorija uma in metajezikovne zmožnosti. Poleg tega se dosežki pri Preizkusu razvrščanja slik niso pomembno povezovali z otrokovim razumevanjem napačnih prepričanj, so se pa ti dosežki pomembno povezovali z otrokovimi dosežki pri preizkusih metajezikovnih zmožnosti, kar kaže na povezanost med otrokovim razvrščanjem slik v celovito zgodbo in njegovimi metajezikovnimi zmožnostmi. Rezultati pa niso pokazali pomembnih razlik v teoriji uma otrok glede na njihovo najpogostejšo vrsto igre. Raziskava nudi celovit pregled odnosov med različnimi vidiki teorije uma pri otrocih in njihovimi metajezikovnimi zmožnostmi ter kot taka opozarja na tesno povezanost obeh konstruktov.

Ključne besede: teorija uma, metajezikovne zmožnosti, metajezikovno zavedanje, pripovedovanje zgodbe, zgodnje otroštvo


Citiraj:
Hacin, K. (2016). Relationship between children's theory of mind and metalinguistic competence in early childhood. Psihološka obzorja, 25, 72–83. https://doi.org/10.20419/2016.25.448


Seznam literature v članku


Antonietti, A., Liverta-Sempio, O., Marchetti, A., & Astington, J. W. (2006). Mental language and understanding of epistemic and emotional mental states. In A. Antonietti, O. Liverta-Sempio and A. Marchetti (Eds.), Theory of mind and language in developmental contexts, (pp. 1–30). New York, NY, USA: Springer Science+Business Media. CrossRef

Applebee, A. N. (1978). The child's concept of story. Chicago, IL, USA: University of Chicago Press.

Astington, J. W. (2001). The future of theory-of-mind research: Understanding motivational states, the role of language, and real-world consequences. Child development, 72(3), 685–687. CrossRef

Astington, J. W., & Jenkins, J. M. (1999). A longitudinal study of the relation between language and theory-of-mind development. Developmental Psychology, 35(5), 1311–1320. CrossRef

Baron Cohen, S., Leslie, A. M., & Frith, U. (1985). Does the autistic child have a »theory of mind«? Cognition, 21, 37–46. CrossRef

Baron Cohen, S., Leslie, A. M., & Frith, U. (1986). Mechanical, behavioural and intentional understanding of picture stories in autistic children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 4, 113–125. CrossRef

Bloom, P., & German, T. P. (2000). Two reasons to abandon the false-belief task as a test of theory of mind. Cognition, 77, 25–31. CrossRef

Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (1999). A nonverbal false belief task: The performance of children and great apes. Child Development, 70(2), 381–395. CrossRef

Charman, T., & Shmueli Goetz, Y. (1998). The relationship between theory of mind, language, and narrative discourse: An experimental study. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive/Current Psychology of Cognition, 17(2), 245–271.

Cutting, A. L., & Dunn, J. (1999). Theory of mind, emotional understanding, language, and family background: Individual differences and interrelations. Child development, 70(4), 853–865. CrossRef

de Villiers, J. (2007). The interface of language and theory of mind. Lingua, 117, 1858–1878. CrossRef

de Villiers, J., & de Villiers, P. (1972). Early judgements of semantic and syntactic acceptability by children. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 1, 299–310. CrossRef

Doherty, M. (2000). Children's understanding of homonymy: Metalinguistic awareness and FB. Journal of Child Language, 27(2), 367–392. CrossRef

Doherty, M., & Perner, J. (1998). Metalinguistic awareness and theory of mind: Just two words for the same thing? Cognitive Development, 13, 279–305. CrossRef

Farrar, M. J., & Ashwell, S. (2012). Phonological awareness, executive functioning, and theory of mind. Cognitive Development, 27, 77–89. CrossRef

Farrar, M. J., Ashwell, S., & Maag, L. (2005). The emergence of phonological awareness: Connections to language and theory of mind development. First language, 25(2), 157–172. CrossRef

Fekonja, U. (2009). Razvoj otroške igre [Child play development]. In L. Marjanovič Umek & M. Zupančič (Eds.), Razvojna psihologija [Developmental psychology] (pp. 382–393). Ljubljana, Slovenia: Znanstveni inštitut Filozofske fakultete.

Gamannossi, B. A., & Pinto, G. (2014). Theory of mind and language of mind in narratives: Developmental trends from kindergarten to primary school. First language, 34(3), 262–272. CrossRef

Gopnik, A., & Astington, J. W. (1988). Children's understanding of representational change and its relation to the understanding of false belief and the appearance-reality distinction. Child development, 59, 26–37. CrossRef

Hughes, C., & Dunn, J. (1997). "Pretend you didn't know": Preschoolers' talk about mental states in pretend play. Cognitive Development, 12, 477–499. CrossRef

Hughes, C., & Dunn, J. (1998). Understanding mind and emotion: Longitudinal associations with mental-state talk between young friends. Developmental Psychology, 34, 1026–1037. CrossRef

Jenkins, J. M., & Astington, J. W. (1996). Cognitive factors and family structure associated with theory of mind development in young children. Developmental Psychology, 32, 70–78. CrossRef

Jenkins, J. M., & Astington, J. W. (2000). Theory of mind and social behaviour: Causal models tested in a longitudinal study. Merrill-Palmer Quaterly, 46(2), 203–220.

Leslie, A. M. (1987). Pretense and representation: The origins of »Theory of mind«. Psychological Review, 94(4), 412–426. CrossRef

Marjanovič Umek, L. (2009). Spoznavni razvoj v zgodnjem otroštvu [Cognitive development in early childhood]. In L. Marjanovič Umek & M. Zupančič (Eds.), Razvojna psihologija [Developmental psychology] (pp. 291–314). Ljubljana, Slovenia: Znanstveni inštitut Filozofske fakultete.

Marjanovič Umek, L., & Fekonja, U. (2009). Razvoj govora v zgodnjem otroštvu [Speech development in early childhood]. In L. Marjanovič Umek & M. Zupančič (Eds.), Razvojna psihologija [Developmental psychology] (pp. 315–333). Ljubljana, Slovenia: Znanstveni inštitut Filozofske fakultete.

Marjanovič Umek, L., & Fekonja Peklaj, U. (2010). The role of symbolic play in early literacy development. Journal of Communications Research, 1(4), 291–308.

Marjanovič Umek, L., Fekonja, U., Podlesek, A., Kranjc, S, & Bajc, K. (2007). Lestvice splošnega govornega razvoja – LJ (LSGR – LJ): Priročnik [Scales of general language development – LJ: Manual]. Ljubljana, Slovenia: Center za psihodiagnostična sredstva.

Marjanovič Umek, L., Fekonja Peklaj, U., Sočan, G., & Komidar, L. (2011). Pripovedovanje zgodbe: Preizkus pripovedovanja zgodbe: Rokavička: Preizkus pripovedovanja zgodbe: Žabji kralj: Priročnik [Storytelling: Storytelling test: The Little glove: Storytelling test: The Frog king: Manual]. Ljubljana, Slovenia: Center za psihodiagnostična sredstva.

Marjanovič Umek, L., & Lešnik Musek, P. (1999). Simbolna igra: Kaj jo določa in kako igra določa otrokov razvoj [Symbolic play: What determines it and how the play determines the child's development]. Psihološka obzorja, 8(2-3), 3–58.

Miller, C. A. (2006). Developmental relationships between language and theory of mind. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 15, 142–154. CrossRef

Milligan, K., Astington J. W., & Dack, L. A. (2007). Language and theory of mind: Meta-analysis of the relation between language ability and false-belief understanding. Child development, 78(2), 622–646. CrossRef

Moore, C., Pure, K., & Furrow, D. (1990). Children's understanding of the modal expression of speaker certainty and uncertainty and its relation to the development of a representational theory of mind. Child development, 61, 722–730. CrossRef

Perner, J. (1991). Understanding the representational mind. Cambridge, MA, USA: Bradford Books/MIT Press.

Perner, J., Baker, S., & Hutton, D. (1994). Prelief: The conceptual origins of belief and pretence. In C. Lewis and P. Mitchell (Eds.), Children's early understanding of mind: Origins and development (pp. 261–286). Hove, United Kingdom: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Perner, J., Stummer, S., Sprung, M., & Doherty, M. (2002). Theory of mind finds its Piagetian perspective: Why alternative naming comes with understanding belief. Cognitive Development, 17, 1451–1472. CrossRef

Slade, L., & Ruffman, T. (2005). How language does (and does not) relate to theory of mind: A longitudinal study of syntax, semantics, working memory and false belief. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 23, 117–141. CrossRef

Wellman, H. M., Cross, D., & Watson, J. (2001). Meta-analysis of theory of mind development: The truth about false-belief. Child Development, 72, 655–684. CrossRef

Wimmer, H., & Perner, J. (1983). Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children's understanding of deception. Cognition, 13, 103–128. CrossRef

Youngblade, L. M., & Dunn, J. (1995). Individual differences in young children's pretend play with mother and siblings: Links to relationship and understanding of other people's feelings and beliefs. Child Development, 66, 1472–1492. CrossRef

Zalla, T., Bouchilloux, N., Labruyere, N., Georgieff, N., Bougerol, T., & Franck, N. (2006). Impairment in event sequencing in disorganised and non-disorganised patients with schizophrenia. Brain Research Bulletin, 68, 195–202. CrossRef


Citati prek sistema CrossRef (1)

Analisis Picture Storybook dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Theory of Mind Anak Usia Dini
       Elsy Gusmayanti, Yulia Ayriza
       Jurnal Obsesi : Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 2023
       https://doi.org/10.31004/obsesi.v7i1.2726


« Nazaj na Letnik 25 (2016)