Go to the article page in English / Pojdi na angleško stran članka
Validacija slovenske oblike Kaufmanovega vprašalnika ustvarjalnih področij
Lina Faletič in Andreja Avsec
Polno besedilo (pdf) | Ogledi: 319 | 
Napisan v slovenščini. | Objavljeno: 22. avgust 2019
https://doi.org/10.20419/2019.28.499 | Citati: CrossRef (3)
Povzetek: Namen naše raziskave je bil sistematično raziskati merske značilnosti slovenskega prevoda Kaufmanovega vprašalnika ustvarjalnih področij K–DOCS, ki preko samoocenjevanja meri stopnjo ustvarjalnega vedenja na osebnem/medosebnem, študijskem, izvedbenem, tehničnem/znanstvenem in umetniškem področju. Udeleženci (N = 319) so izpolnili omenjeni vprašalnik in Vprašalnik velikih pet BFI–K. Konfirmatorna faktorska analiza vprašalnika K–DOCS je pokazala, da se petfaktorski model dobro prilega podatkom, torej je razvrstitev ustvarjalnega vedenja na pet področij, kot jih je predlagal avtor vprašalnika, ustrezna. Povezanost med petimi področji ustvarjalnosti ter velikimi petimi faktorji osebnosti se je ujemala s pričakovanji, saj se je z vsemi področji ustvarjalnosti, razen s tehničnim/znanstvenim, najbolj povezovala odprtost za izkušnje. Ravno tako so bili rezultati razlik med spoloma skladni s pričakovanji, saj so moški poročali o višji ustvarjalnosti na tehničnem/znanstvenem področju, ženske pa na umetniškem področju. Slovenski prevod Kaufmanovega vprašalnika ustvarjalnih področij se je izkazal kot zanesljiv in konstruktno veljaven inštrument za merjenje posameznikove ocene lastne ustvarjalnosti na petih področjih vsakodnevnega življenja.
Ključne besede: Kaufmanove lestvice ustvarjalnih področij, validacija, faktorska struktura, osebnostne lastnosti, razlike med spoloma
Citiraj:
Faletič, L. in Avsec, A. (2019). Validacija slovenske oblike Kaufmanovega vprašalnika ustvarjalnih področij [Validation of the Slovene form of Kaufman Domains of Creativity Scale]. Psihološka obzorja, 28, 40–52. https://doi.org/10.20419/2019.28.499
Seznam literature v članku
Abraham, A. (2016). Gender and creativity: An overview of psychological and neuroscientific literature. Brain Imaging and Behavior, 10(2), 609–618. CrossRef
Abraham, A. in Windmann, S. (2007). Creative cognition: The diverse operations and the prospect of applying a cognitive neuroscience perspective. Methods, 42, 38–48. CrossRef
Allen, A. P. in Thomas, K. E. (2011). A dual process account of creative thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 23(2), 109–118. CrossRef
Carmeli, A. McKay, A. S. in Kaufman, J. C. (2013). Emotional intelligence and creativity: The mediating role of generosity and vigor. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 48(4), 290–309. CrossRef
Carson, S., Peterson, J. B. in Higgins, D. M. (2005). Reliability, validity and factor structure of the Creative achievement questionnaire. Creativity Research Journal, 17(1), 37–50. CrossRef
Conner, T. S. in Silvia, P. J. (2015). Creative days: A daily diary study of emotion, personality and everyday creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity and the Arts, 9(4), 463–470. CrossRef
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Creativity: An overview. V M. Csikszentmihalyi (ur.), Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention (str. 337–342). New York, NY, ZDA: Harper Collins Publishers.
DeYoung, C. G., Quilty, L. C., Peterson, J. B. in Gray, J. R. (2014). Openness to experience, intellect and cognitive ability. Journal of Personality Assessment, 96(1), 46–52. CrossRef
Dollinger, S. J., Urban, K. K. in James, T. A. (2004). Creativity and openness: Further validation of two creative product measures. Creativity Research Journal, 16(1), 35–47. CrossRef
Feist, G. J. (2010). The function of personality in creativity: The nature and nurture of the creative personality. V J. C. Kaufman in R. J. Sternberg (ur.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (str. 113–130). New York: Cambridge university press. CrossRef
Feist, G. J. in Barron, F. X. (2003). Predicting creativity from early to late adulthood: Intellect, potential and personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(2), 62–88. CrossRef
Fürst, G., Ghisletta, P. in Lubart T. (2012). The creative process in visual art: A longitudinal multivariate study. Creativity Research Journal, 24(4), 283–295. CrossRef
Glăveanu, V. P. (2019). Measuring creativity across cultures: Epistemological and methodological considerations. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity and the Arts, 13(2), 227–232. CrossRef
Grosul, M. in Feist G. J. (2014). The creative person in science. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity and the Arts, 8(1), 30–43. CrossRef
Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444–454. CrossRef
IBM Corp. (2011). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 20.0. Armonk, NY, ZDA: IBM Corp.
Ivcevic, Z., Brackett, M. A. in Mayer, J. D. (2007). Emotional intelligence and emotional creativity. Journal of Personality, 75(2), 199–235. CrossRef
Ivcevic, Z. in Mayer, J. D. (2009). Mapping dimensions of creativity in the life-space. Creativity Research Journal, 2(2–3), 152–165. CrossRef
Jeon, K., Moon, S. M. in French, B. (2011). Differential effects of divergent thinking, domain knowledge, and interest on creative performance in art and math. Creativity Research Journal, 23(1), 60–71. CrossRef
John, O. P., Donahue, E. M. in Kantle, R. L. (1991). The Big Five Inventory-versions 4a and 54. Berkeley, CA, ZDA: University of California, Berkeley, Institute of personality and social research.
John, O. P. in Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big five trait taxonomy: History, measurement and theoretical perspectives. V L. A. Pervin in O. P. John (ur.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (str. 102–139). New York, NY, ZDA: Guilford press.
Karwowski, M. in Lebuda, I. (2015). The big five, the huge two and creative self-beliefs: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity and the Arts, 10(2), 214–232. CrossRef
Kaufman, J. C. (2006). Self-reported differences in creativity by ethnicity and gender. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 1065–1082. CrossRef
Kaufman, J. C. (2012). Counting the muses: Development of the Koufman Domains of Creativity Scale (K-DOCS). Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity and the Arts, 6(4), 298–308. CrossRef
Kaufman, J. C. in Bear, J. (2004). Sure, I'm creative – but not in mathematics!: Self-reported creativity in diverse domains. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 22(2), 143–155. CrossRef
Kaufman, J. C. in Baer, J. (2012). Beyond new and appropriate: Who decides what is creative? Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 83–91. CrossRef
Kaufman, J. C., Quilty, L. C., Grazioplene, R. G., Hirsh, J. B., Gray, J. R., Peterson, J. B. in DeYoung, C. G. (2014). Openness to experience and intellect differentially predict creative achievement in the arts and sciences. Journal of Personality, 84(2), 248–258. CrossRef
Kaufman, J. C., Waterstreet, M. A., Ailabouni, H. S., Whitcomb, H. J., Roe, A. K. in Riggs, M. (2010). Personality and self-perceptions of creativity across domains. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 29(3), 193–209. CrossRef
Kim, K. H. (2005). Can only intelligent people be creative? A meta-analysis. The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 16(2/3), 57–66. CrossRef
Little, T. D., Cunningham, W. A. in Shahar, G. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the questions, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 151–173. CrossRef
Little, T. D., Rhemtulla, M., Gibson, K. in Schoemann, M. (2013). Why the item versus parcels controversy needn't be one. Psychological Methods, 18(3), 285–300. CrossRef
Ma, H. (2009). The effect size of variables associated with creativity: A meta-analysis. Creativity Research Journal, 21(1), 30–42. CrossRef
McKay, A. S., Karwowski, M. in Kaufman, J. C. (2017). Measuring the muses: Validating the Kaufman Domains of Creativity Scale (K-DOCS). Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 11(2), 216–230. CrossRef
Miller, A. L. (2014). A self-report measure of cognitive processes associated with creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 26(2), 203–218. CrossRef
Muthén, L. K. in Muthén, B. O. (1998–2015). Mplus user'sguide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA, ZDA: Muthén & Muthén.
Osborne, J. W. in Costello, A. B. (2004). Sample size and subject to item ratio in principal component analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evolution, 9(11), 9–19.
Piffer, D. (2012). Can creativity be measured? An attempt to clarify the notion of creativity and general direction for future research. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 7, 258–264. CrossRef
Pretz, J. E. in McCollum, V. A. (2014). Self-perceptions of creativity do not always reflect actual creative performance. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity and the Arts, 8(2), 227–236. CrossRef
Rammstedt, B. in John, O. P. (2005). Kurzversion des Big five inventory (BFI-K): Entwicklung und Validierung eines ökonomischen Inventars zur Erfassung der fünf Faktoren der Persönlichkeit [Kratka oblika Vprašalnika Velikih Pet (BFI-K): Razvoj in validacija kratkega vprašalnika za ocenjevanje petih faktorjev osebnosti]. Diagnostica, 51(4), 195–206. CrossRef
Rhemtulla, M., Brosseau-Liard, P. E. in Savalei, V. (2012). When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions. Psychological Methods, 17, 354–373. CrossRef
Runco, M. A. in Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 92–96. CrossRef
Silvia, P. (2018). Creativity is undefinable, controllable, and everywhere. V R. Sternberg in J. Kaufman (ur.), The nature of human creativity (str. 291–301). Cambridge, Združeno kraljestvo: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
Silvia, P. J., Wigert, B., Reiter-Palmon, R. in Kaufman, J. C. (2012). Assessing creativity with self-report scales: A review and empirical evaluation. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity and the Arts, 6(1), 19–34. CrossRef
Sternberg, R. J. (2012). The assessment of creativity: An investment-based approach. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 3–12. CrossRef
Stierand, M., Dörfler, V. in MacBryde, J. (2014). Creativity and innovation in Houte cuisine: toward a systematic model. Creativity and Innovation Management, 23(1), 15–28. CrossRef
Zager Kocjan, G. (2016). Zavzetost, strast in zanos pri zaposlenih: Teoretična in empirična razmejitev (neobjavljena doktorska disertacija). Filozofska fakulteta Univerze v Ljubljani, Slovenija.
Zhang, L. in Sternberg, R. J. (2011). Revisiting the Investment theory of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 23(3), 229–238. CrossRef
Citati prek sistema CrossRef (3)
Norming the Muses: Establishing the Psychometric Properties of the Kaufman Domains of Creativity Scale
Hansika Kapoor, Roni Reiter-Palmon, James C. Kaufman
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 2021
https://doi.org/10.1177/07342829211008334
Upor ob prepričevanju v povezavi z osebnostjo
Maruša Cizl, Bojan Musil
Psihološka obzorja / Horizons of Psychology, 2022
https://doi.org/10.20419/2022.31.547
Counting the Muses in German Speakers – Evaluation of the German-Language Translation of the Kaufman Domains of Creativity Scales (K-DOCS)
Kay Brauer, Rebekka Sendatzki, James C. Kaufman, René T. Proyer
Psychological Test Adaptation and Development, 2022
https://doi.org/10.1027/2698-1866/a000024
