Go to the article page in English / Pojdi na angleško stran članka
Osebnostne lastnosti kot napovedniki različnih vidikov subjektivnega blagostanja pri starejših odraslih
Mojca Petrič in Maja Zupančič
Polno besedilo (pdf) | Ogledi: 377 | Napisan v angleščini. | Objavljeno: 2. april 2021
https://doi.org/10.20419/2021.30.528 | Citati: CrossRef (1)
Povzetek: V raziskavi smo proučili sočasno napovedno vrednost osebnostnih potez za tri sestavine subjektivnega blagostanja pri normativnem vzorcu (N = 272; 70 % žensk) starejših odraslih (M = 71,82 let, SD = 6,03) v Sloveniji. Pri tem smo izhajali iz modela Velikih pet osebnostnih lastnosti ter Keyesovega celostnega modela subjektivnega blagostanja (SB), ki vključuje čustveno (ČB), psihološko (PB) in socialno blagostanje (SoB). V napovednih modelih SB smo najprej upoštevali demografske značilnosti udeležencev (spol, starost, zakonski stan, raven izobrazbe) in njihovo subjektivno oceno zdravja, potem pa dodali samoocene petih osebnostnih lastnosti. Uporabili smo Vprašalnik subjektivne ocene zdravja, ki smo ga oblikovali za namen raziskave, kratko obliko Kontinuuma duševnega zdravja ter Vprašalnik pet velikih faktorjev BFI. Demografske značilnosti niso značilno napovedovale sestavin SB, medtem ko je subjektivna ocena zdravja prirastno pojasnila značilen delež variance v ČB in PB. Sklop petih osebnostnih lastnosti je značilno izboljšal napoved, preko demografskih značilnosti in subjektivne ocene zdravja. Pri tem se je sprejemljivost povezovala z vsemi tremi sestavinami SB, štiri osebnostne lastnosti pa so se s posameznimi sestavinami SB povezovale razlikovalno. Visoka raven vestnosti in nizka raven nevroticizma sta pomembno napovedovali ČB, vestnost, ekstravertnost in odprtost so napovedovale PB, odprtost pa SoB.
Ključne besede: starejši odrasli, osebnost, Velikih pet, subjektivno blagostanje, Keyesov model blagostanja
Citiraj:
Petrič, M. in Zupančič, M. (2021). Personality traits predicting different aspects of subjective well-being in elderly adults. Psihološka obzorja, 30, 15–25. https://doi.org/10.20419/2021.30.528
Seznam literature v članku
Abbott, R. A., Croudace, T. J., Ploubidis, G. B., Kuh, D., Wadsworth, M. E. J., Richards, M., & Huppert, F. A. (2008). The relationship between early personality and midlife psychological well-being: Evidence from a UK birth cohort study. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 43(9), 679–687.CrossRef
Avsec, A., & Sočan, G. (2007). Vprašalnik petih velikih faktorjev BFI [The Big Five Inventory BFI]. In A. Avsec (Ed.), Psihodiagnostika osebnosti [Psychodiagnostics of personality] (pp. 171–178). Department of Psychology, University of Ljubljana.
Baltes, P. B., & Baltes, M. M. (1990). Psychological perspectives on successful aging: The model of selective optimization with compensation. In P. B. Baltes & M. M. Baltes (Eds.), Successful aging: Perspectives from the behavioral sciences (pp. 1–34). Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Belsky, J., Jaffee, S. R., Caspi, A., Moffitt, T., & Silva, P. A. (2003). Intergenerational relationships in young adulthood and their life course, mental health, and personality correlates. Journal of Family Psychology, 17(4), 460–471.CrossRef
Bennett, K. M. (2005). Psychological wellbeing in later life: The longitudinal effects of marriage, widowhood and marital status change. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 20(3), 280–284.CrossRef
Binder, M., & Coad, A. (2013). »I'm afraid I have bad news for you…«: Estimating the impact of different health impairments on subjective well-being. Social Science & Medicine, 87, 55–167.CrossRef
Borg, C., Hallberg, I. R., & Blomquist, K. (2005). Life satisfaction among older people (65+) with reduced self-care capacity: The relationship to social, health and financial aspects. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 15(5), 607–618.CrossRef
Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Borgogni, L., Bucik, V., Boben, D., Hruševar-Bobek, B., Zupančič, M., & Horvat, M. (2012). Model »velikih pet«: pripomočki za merjenje strukture osebnosti: priročnik [The Big Five Model: Questionnaires to assess personality structure: Assessment manual] . Center za psihodiagnostična sredstva.
Carstensen, L. L., Isaacowitz, D. M., & Charles, S. T. (1999). Taking time seriously: A theory of socioemotional selectivity. American Psychologist, 54(3), 165–181.CrossRef
Caspi, A. (1998). Personality development across the life course. In W. Damon & N. Eisenberg (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Social, emotional, and personality development (pp. 311–388). Wiley.
Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1980). Influence of extraversion and neuroticism on subjective well-being: Happy and unhappy people. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38(4), 668–678.CrossRef
DeNeve, K. M., & Cooper, H. (1998). The happy personality: A meta-analysis of 137 personality traits and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 197–229.CrossRef
Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American Psychologist, 55(1), 34–43.CrossRef
Diener, E. (2012). New findings and future directions for subjective well-being research. American Psychologist, 67, 590–597.CrossRef
Diener, E., & Chan, M. Y. (2011). Happy people live longer: Subjective well-being contributes to health and longevity. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-being, 3(1), 1–43.CrossRef
Diener, E., & Lucas, R. E. (1999). Personality and subjective well-being. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Wellbeing: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 213–229). Russell Sage Foundation.
Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Lucas, R. E. (2003). Personality, culture, and subjective well-being: Emotional and cognitive evaluation of life. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 403–425.CrossRef
Diener, E., & Suh, E. M. (1997). Measuring quality of life: Economic, social, and subjective indicators. Social Indicators Research, 40(1–2), 189–216.CrossRef
Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. E. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 276–302.CrossRef
Dillaway, H. E., & Byrnes, M. (2009). Reconsidering successful aging: A call for renewed and expanded academic critiques and conceptualizations. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 28(6), 702–722.CrossRef
Elliot, A. J., & Thrash, T. M. (2002). Approach-avoidance motivation in personality: Approach and avoidance temperaments and goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(5), 804–818.CrossRef
Eurostat. (2019). Ageing Europe. Looking at the lives of older people in EU. https://www.age-platform.eu/publications/ ageing-europe-looking-lives-older-people-eu-eurostat- 2019-report
Fagerström, C., Borg, C., Balducci, C., Burholt, V., Wenger, C. G., Ferring, D., Weber, G., Holst, G., & Hallberg, I. R. (2007). Life satisfaction and associated factors among people aged 60 years and above in six European countries. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 2(1), 33–50.CrossRef
Friedman, H. S., & Kern, M. L. (2014). Personality, well-being, and health. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 719–742.CrossRef
Gallagher, M. W., Lopez, S. J., & Preacher, K. J. (2009). The hierarchical structure of well-being. Journal of Personality, 77, 1025–1049.CrossRef
Gomez, V., Krings, F., Baugarter, A., & Grob, A. (2009). The influence of personality and life events on subjective well-being from a life span perspective. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 345–354.CrossRef
Gray, J. A. (1990). Brain systems that mediate both emotion and cognition. Cognition & Emotion, 4(3), 269–288.CrossRef
Hansen, T., & Slagsvold, B. (2012). The age and subjective well-being paradox revisited: A multidimensional perspective. Norsk Epidemiologi, 22(2), 187–195.CrossRef
Hill, P. L., Turiano, N. A., Mroczek, D. K., & Roberts, B. W. (2012). Examining concurrent and longitudinal relations between personality traits and social well-being in adulthood. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(6), 698–705.CrossRef
Jivraj, S., Nazroo, J., Vanhoutte, B., & Chandola, T. (2014). Aging and subjective well-being in later life. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 69(6), 930–941.CrossRef
John, O. P., Donahue, E. M., & Kentle, R. L. (1991). The Big Five Inventory--Versions 4a and 54. University of California, Berkeley, Institute of Personality and Social Research.CrossRef
John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big-Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 102–138). Guilford Press.
Joshanloo, M., & Nosratabadi, M. (2009). Levels of mental health continuum and personality traits. Social Indicators Research, 90(2), 211–224.CrossRef
Joshanloo, M., Rastegar, P., & Bakhshi, A. (2012). The Big Five personality domains as predictors of social wellbeing in Iranian university students. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 29(5), 639–660.CrossRef
Kahlbaugh, P., & Huffman, L. (2017). Personality, emotional qualities of leisure, and subjective well-being in the elderly. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 85(2), 164–184.CrossRef
Keyes, C. L. M. (1998). Social well-being. Social Psychology Quarterly, 61, 121–140.CrossRef
Keyes, C. L. M. (2002). The Mental Health Continuum: From languishing to flourishing in life. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 43, 207–222.CrossRef
Keyes, C. L. M. (2007). Promoting and protecting mental health as flourishing: A complementary strategy for improving national mental health. American Psychologist, 62(2), 95–108.CrossRef
Keyes, C. L. M. (2009). Brief description of the Mental Health Continuum Short Form (MHC-SF) . https://www.aacu.org/sites/default/files/MHC-SFEnglish.pdf
Keyes, C. L. M., Shmotkin, D., & Ryff, C. D. (2002). Optimizing well-being: The empirical encounter of two traditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 1007–1022.CrossRef
Lamers, S. M. A., Glas, C. A. W., Westerhof, G. J., & Bohlmeijer, E. T. (2012). Longitudinal evaluation of the Mental Health Continuum-Short Form (MHC-SF): Measurement invariance across demographics, physical illness and mental illness. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 28(4), 290–296.CrossRef
Lemon, B. W., Bengtson, V. L., & Peterson, J. A. (1972). An exploration of the activity theory of aging: Activity types and life satisfaction among in-movers to a retirement community. Journal of Gerontology, 27(4), 511–523.CrossRef
Lucas, R. E. (2008). Personality and subjective well-being. In R. J. Larsen & M. Eid (Eds.), The science of subjective well-being (pp. 171–194). Guilford Press.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1991). Adding liebe und arbeit: The full five-factor model and well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17(2), 227–232.CrossRef
McCrae, R. R., & Löckenhoff, C. E. (2014). Self-regulation and the five-factor model of personality traits. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of personality and self-regulation (pp.145–168). Wiley Blackwell.CrossRef
Mroczek, D. K., & Spiro III, A. (2005). Change in life satisfaction during adulthood: Findings from the Veterans affairs normative aging study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(1), 189–202.CrossRef
Okun, M. A., Stock, W. A., Haring, M. J., & Witter, R. A. (1984). Health and subjective well-being: A meta-analysis. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 19(2), 111–132.CrossRef
Ozer, D. J., & Benet-Martinez, V. (2006). Personality and the prediction of consequential outcomes. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 401–421.CrossRef
Pavot, W., Diener, E., & Fujita, F. (1990). Extraversion and happiness. Personality and Individual Differences, 11, 1299–1306.CrossRef
Petrič, M. (2015). Napovedniki Keyesovega modela duševnega zdravja pri starostnikih [Predictors of the Keyes's model of mental health in elderly] [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Ljubljana.
Pinquart, M., & Sörensen, S. (2000). Influences of socioeconomic status, social network, and competence on subjective well-being in later life: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Aging, 15(2), 187–224.CrossRef
Roberts, B. W., Jackson, J. J., Fayard, J. V., Edmonds, G., & Meints, J. (2013). Conscientiousness. In M. R. Leary & R. H. Hoyle (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in social behavior (pp. 369–381). The Guilford Press.
Rowe, J. W., & Kahn, R. L. (1997). Successful aging. The Gerontologist, 37(4), 433−440.CrossRef
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141–166.CrossRef
Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of eudaimonic well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1069–1081.CrossRef
Ryff, C. D. (2013). Eudaimonic well-being and health: Mapping consequences of self-realization. In A. S. Waterman (Ed.), The best within us: Positive psychology perspectives on eudaemonia (pp. 77–98). American Psychological Association.CrossRef
Sargent-Cox, K. A., Anstey, K. J., & Luszcz, M. A. (2010). Patterns of longitudinal change in older adults' self-rated health: The effect of the point of reference. Health Psychology, 29(2), 143–152.CrossRef
Schmutte, P. S., & Ryff, C. D. (1997). Personality and well-being: Reexamining methods and meanings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(3), 549–559.CrossRef
Shapiro, A., & Keyes, C. L. M. (2008). Marital status and social well-being: Are the married always better off? Social Indicators Research, 88(2), 329–346.CrossRef
Snowden, M., Dhingra, S. S., Keyes, C. L. M., & Anderson, L. A. (2010). Changes in mental well-being in the transition to late life: Findings from MIDUS I and II. American Journal of Public Health, 100(12), 2385–2388.CrossRef
Statistical Office. (2017). Število in sestava prebivalstva [Population structure]. http://www.stat.si/StatWeb/Field/Index/104
Staudinger, U. M., Fleeson, W., & Baltes, P. B. (1999). Predictors of subjective physical health and global well-being: Similarities and differences between the United States and Germany. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(2), 305–319.CrossRef
Steel, P., Schmidt, J., & Shultz, J. (2008). Refining the relationship between personality and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 138–161.CrossRef
Stephan, Y. (2009). Openness to experience and active older adults' life satisfaction: A trait and facet-level analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 47(6), 637–641.CrossRef
Stowe, J. D., & Cooney, T. M. (2015). Examining Rowe and Kahn's concept of successful aging: Importance of taking a life course perspective. The Gerontologist, 55(1), 43–50.CrossRef
Teuscher, U. (2009). Subjective age bias: A motivational and information processing approach. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 33(1), 22–31.CrossRef
Vittersǿ, J. (2001). Personality traits and subjective well-being: Emotional stability, not extraversion, is probably the important predictor. Personality and Individual Differences, 31(6), 903–914.CrossRef
Waterman, A. S. (1993). Two conceptions of happiness: Contrasts of personal expressiveness (eudaimonia) and hedonic enjoyment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 678–691.CrossRef
Zager Kocjan, G. (2016). Engagement, passion, and flow among employees: A theoretical and empirical distinction [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Ljubljana.
Zupančič, M., & Kavčič, T. (2017). Personality, life events, and three components of subsequent subjective well-being in female university students. Social Inquiry into Well-Being, 3(1), 1–14.
Citati prek sistema CrossRef (1)
Integral definition and conceptual model of mental health: Proposal from a systematic review of different paradigms
Maday Alicia Coronel-Santos, Juan Carlos Rodríguez-Macías
Frontiers in Sociology, 2022
https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2022.978804
